2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early days of quantum crystallography: A personal account

Abstract: This work summarizes the author's activity in developing quantum crystallography. The approximations based on the intrinsic properties of the one-electron single-determinant density matrix, which allow its reconstructing from the experimentally measured coherent X-ray diffraction structure factors are discussed. The actual results obtained within such an approach are given. Article critically considers the early works in the field and places them to the present context. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, QTAIM, which relies on the zero-flux boundary condition [35][36][37][38][39][40], is one of the current leading theoretical approaches used to study the nature and strength of hydrogen bonding and other non-covalent interactions. Two of its charge density-based topological descriptors, viz., the presence of a bond path (bp), and the presence of the (3,-1) bond critical point (bcp) between interacting atomic basins have proved very useful in inferring the presence of a chemical bonding in chemical systems [35][36][37][38][39][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Two of its other signatures, the sign of the Laplacian of the charge density ( 2  b ) and the sign of the total energy density (H b ) at a bcp, can be used (and have been recommended) to determine whether the interaction between two atomic basins in a given pair is ionic, covalent, or a mixture of the two [59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, QTAIM, which relies on the zero-flux boundary condition [35][36][37][38][39][40], is one of the current leading theoretical approaches used to study the nature and strength of hydrogen bonding and other non-covalent interactions. Two of its charge density-based topological descriptors, viz., the presence of a bond path (bp), and the presence of the (3,-1) bond critical point (bcp) between interacting atomic basins have proved very useful in inferring the presence of a chemical bonding in chemical systems [35][36][37][38][39][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Two of its other signatures, the sign of the Laplacian of the charge density ( 2  b ) and the sign of the total energy density (H b ) at a bcp, can be used (and have been recommended) to determine whether the interaction between two atomic basins in a given pair is ionic, covalent, or a mixture of the two [59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] The radial decay of the pseudo-atomsa nd the core and valence scattering factors in multipole modelsa re directly calculated from wavefunctions and hence the analytical shape of the refined electron density is significantly influenced by quantum chemistry.I ti si mportant to mention that, to ag ood approximation, the set of multipolar orbitals may be relatedt oa tomic hybridization states [20] and even to some individual orbital occupancies, for example that of d-orbitals in transition metals, [21] and more recently that of f-orbitals in lanthanides. [44] and Ref. [23] Cross-fertilized by charge-density research, ways of directly fitting the shapes of orbitals andw avefunctions to the mea-sured diffraction pattern were also devised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage in this context is that BEDE and LONE do not reach the same sophistication in representing electron density as invarioms, transferable aspherical atom models (TAAMs) or Hirshfeld atom refinement; fine features of the EDD are not as well represented in the scattering factor model. 12 The goal of the new model is not to replace earlier charge-density or current quantum-crystallography (Massa et al, 1995;Grabowsky et al, 2017;Tsirelson, 2018) Concept and the different options m for the LONE instruction. The H-atom treatment corresponding to the same m is also shown, including angle expectations according to the VSEPR model.…”
Section: Lone Pair Electron Density: Lonementioning
confidence: 99%