2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early coronary angiography in patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As to the primary endpoints, our analysis did show a hospital discharged survival and long-term survival bene ts with early CAG for NSTE OHCA when analyzed by the subgroup of observational studies and overall groups. Consistently, two reviews [6,9] and some observational studies [10][11][12] support the result of the present analysis. Vadeboncoeur et al [10] conducted a study including 1230 cases NSTE OHCA, the survival to hospital discharge was 78.3% for those without CAG and 81.5% for those who underwent CAG (p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As to the primary endpoints, our analysis did show a hospital discharged survival and long-term survival bene ts with early CAG for NSTE OHCA when analyzed by the subgroup of observational studies and overall groups. Consistently, two reviews [6,9] and some observational studies [10][11][12] support the result of the present analysis. Vadeboncoeur et al [10] conducted a study including 1230 cases NSTE OHCA, the survival to hospital discharge was 78.3% for those without CAG and 81.5% for those who underwent CAG (p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Vadeboncoeur et al [10] conducted a study including 1230 cases NSTE OHCA, the survival to hospital discharge was 78.3% for those without CAG and 81.5% for those who underwent CAG (p < 0.0001). A recent meta-analysis [9] of 8 studies reported that the strategy of early CAG was associated with decreased short-term (OR=0.46, 95% CI =0.36-0.56, P<0.001) and long-term (OR=0.59, 95%CI=0.44-0.74, P<0.001) mortality. Hollenbeck et al [11] found that patients treated with CAG were more likely to receive mechanical support and were also treated with more aggressive anticoagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Callaway and his college demonstrated in a multicenter study between 2007 and 2009 with 3,981 patients that early coronary angiography was an independent predictor for survival and favorable outcome. More recently Khan et al showed in a meta‐analysis of eight studies (seven observational studies and one randomized study) that the use of coronary angiography was associated with decreased short‐term (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.36–0.56, p < .001) and long‐term (OR 0.59; 95%CI 0.44–0.74, p < .001) mortality. Predictors of in‐hospital mortality in our study were older age, metabolic derangement on admission, initial nonshockable rhythm and failure to achieve ROSC before admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another meta-analysis, conducted in 2012, compared CAG and PCI with conventional treatment (late/no CAG) in patients with and without ST elevation and revealed improvement in survival with early CAG (OR = 2.78; 95%CI = 1.89–4.10; P < .001 in 10 studies with 3103 patients). [ 24 ] A meta-analysis by Khan et al [ 27 ] that included eight studies, with some published as recently as 2017, compared acute CAG with non-acute CAG in patients without ST elevation followed OHCA. The study concluded that early CAG was associated with decreased short-term mortality (OR = 0.46; 95%CI = 0.36–0.56; P < .001, with 2133 patients).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%