2002
DOI: 10.1038/nature712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex

Abstract: Behavioural studies indicate that a newly acquired motor skill is rapidly consolidated from an initially unstable state to a more stable state, whereas neuroimaging studies demonstrate that the brain engages new regions for performance of the task as a result of this consolidation. However, it is not known where a new skill is retained and processed before it is firmly consolidated. Some early aspects of motor skill acquisition involve the primary motor cortex (M1), but the nature of that involvement is unclea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

63
574
5
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 708 publications
(662 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
63
574
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, both the ROI analysis (Fig.3) and the subjective evaluation score (Fig.5) showed the two-week practice period did not result in any further increase in either the level of BOLD signal or the perception of task performance. The seemingly plateaued level of activation that we have seen in this study is in accordance with other behavioral/neuroimaging studies whereby newly acquired motor skill, once rapidly consolidated ('fast learning'), tapers off in terms of both performance and functional representation in the long term [Karni et al, 1998;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Krakauer and Shadmehr 2006]. However the current study does not provide enough data to examine this 'learning curve' effect and calls for the examination of the longitudinal studies extending to longer terms beyond the tested two-week practice period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, both the ROI analysis (Fig.3) and the subjective evaluation score (Fig.5) showed the two-week practice period did not result in any further increase in either the level of BOLD signal or the perception of task performance. The seemingly plateaued level of activation that we have seen in this study is in accordance with other behavioral/neuroimaging studies whereby newly acquired motor skill, once rapidly consolidated ('fast learning'), tapers off in terms of both performance and functional representation in the long term [Karni et al, 1998;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Krakauer and Shadmehr 2006]. However the current study does not provide enough data to examine this 'learning curve' effect and calls for the examination of the longitudinal studies extending to longer terms beyond the tested two-week practice period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies have shown that similar improvements develop provided sleep occurs within a critical time after initial practice (Fischer et al 2002;Walker et al 2003). Some procedural memories also remain susceptible to interference for a critical time following acquisition (Brashers-Krug et al 1996;Muellbacher et al 2002;Walker et al 2003). Thus, a critical time window may be a general feature of offline processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, we did not administer rTMS to a cortical area other than M1 of the FDI area to determine the motor cortical specificity of rTMS's effects on strength gains and also used only one frequency and one intensity. Considering that rTMS of occipital and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex did not affect motor consolidation in a previous study (41), we excluded such control experiments.…”
Section: Role Of Primary Motor Cortex In Maximal Voluntary Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, voluntary activation tested with TMS was deficient in an intrinsic hand muscle, suggesting that there is some supraspinal capacity rTMS can act upon (28). We thus examined the possibility that, akin to homeostatic-like effects, voluntary muscle contractions, which raise corticospinal excitability, would potentiate the inhibitory effects of subsequently administered 1-Hz rTMS (41,45,56). This enhanced inhibitory effect would in turn reduce corticospinal excitability and interfere with the processes involved in generating voluntary force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%