2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early cognitive profiles predicting reading and arithmetic skills in grades 1 and 7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also when the early literacy and numeracy skills create a foundation for future reading and mathematical skill development: Symbolic and nonsymbolic numeracy skills, assessed before school entry, have been shown to predict later mathematical skills (Watts et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Koponen et al, 2016;Koponen et al, 2019;Schneider et al, 2017;Chu et al, 2018;Geary et al, 2018), and early language and literacy skills have been shown to predict reading skills (e.g., Torppa et al, 2010;Ziegler et al, 2010;Psyridou et al, 2018;Hjetland et al, 2020). Reading and mathematical development are deeply interconnected processes, and emerging evidence reveals both shared and unshared predictors of reading and mathematical skill development (e.g., Purpura et al, 2011;Davidse et al, 2014;Purpura and Ganley, 2014;Purpura et al, 2017a;Korpipää, 2020;Vanbinst et al, 2020). At school age, the comorbidity of reading difficulties (RD) and mathematical difficulties (MD) is also common: The rate of the cooccurrence of these difficulties has been estimated to be approximately 30-70% (Landerl and Moll, 2010;Moll et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also when the early literacy and numeracy skills create a foundation for future reading and mathematical skill development: Symbolic and nonsymbolic numeracy skills, assessed before school entry, have been shown to predict later mathematical skills (Watts et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Koponen et al, 2016;Koponen et al, 2019;Schneider et al, 2017;Chu et al, 2018;Geary et al, 2018), and early language and literacy skills have been shown to predict reading skills (e.g., Torppa et al, 2010;Ziegler et al, 2010;Psyridou et al, 2018;Hjetland et al, 2020). Reading and mathematical development are deeply interconnected processes, and emerging evidence reveals both shared and unshared predictors of reading and mathematical skill development (e.g., Purpura et al, 2011;Davidse et al, 2014;Purpura and Ganley, 2014;Purpura et al, 2017a;Korpipää, 2020;Vanbinst et al, 2020). At school age, the comorbidity of reading difficulties (RD) and mathematical difficulties (MD) is also common: The rate of the cooccurrence of these difficulties has been estimated to be approximately 30-70% (Landerl and Moll, 2010;Moll et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, multiplication facts are stored in verbal memory (Dehaene, 1992;Dehaene & Cohen, 1995;Dehaene et al, 2003). In line with this idea, learning multiplication facts depends on language skills and memory (LeFevre et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2021; this is true also for arithmetic facts other than multiplication); and phonological skills predict arithmetic abilities (Jordan et al, 2010;Korpipää et al, 2020;Simmons & Singleton, 2008). Thus, while understanding the mathematical aspects of multiplication is necessaryit provides a way to solve multiplication exercises, and it underlies the knowledge of how to use multiplication for particular goals-rote memory helps become proficient in arithmetic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Upon determining the factor structure of the Internet and Virtual Social Network Use and Attitudes Scale and evaluating the internal reliability of each subscale, we conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA). This technique seeks to capture population variability with the fewest latent profiles (Korpipää et al, 2020). Unlike traditional cluster analysis, LPA allows deciding the number of profiles based on different fit indices (Morin & Marsh, 2015;Stanley et al, 2017): Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and likelihood ratio test (LRT).…”
Section: Latent Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%