1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00801.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early coding of reaching: frontal and parietal association connections of parieto‐occipital cortex

Abstract: The ipsilateral association connections of the cortex of the dorsal part of the rostral bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus and of the adjoining posterior part of the superior parietal lobule were studied by using different retrograde fluorescent tracers. Fluoro-Ruby, Fast blue and Diamidino yellow were injected into visual area V6A, and dorso-caudal (PMdc, F2) and dorso-rostral (PMdr, F7) premotor cortex, respectively. The parietal area of injection had been previously characterized physiologically in behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
55
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LDs of several tens of milliseconds, as seen here and also in previous studies (Riehle, 1991;Kalaska and Crammond, 1992;Johnson et al, 1996;Pesaran et al, 2008), seem rather long to be attributable to transmission delays between the monosynaptically connected areas PMd and PRR (Pandya and Kuypers, 1969;Jones and Powell, 1970;Kurata, 1991;Johnson et al, 1996;Caminiti et al, 1999;Marconi et al, 2001;Tanné-Gariépy et al, 2002;BattagliaMayer et al, 2003). Instead, we prefer to attribute the observed large frontoparietal LDs to the dynamic reorganization of network activity, which is required in visuospatially organized areas like PRR in the case of spatial remapping.…”
Section: Shorter Motor-goal Latencies In Pmd Than Prr In Remapping Cosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…LDs of several tens of milliseconds, as seen here and also in previous studies (Riehle, 1991;Kalaska and Crammond, 1992;Johnson et al, 1996;Pesaran et al, 2008), seem rather long to be attributable to transmission delays between the monosynaptically connected areas PMd and PRR (Pandya and Kuypers, 1969;Jones and Powell, 1970;Kurata, 1991;Johnson et al, 1996;Caminiti et al, 1999;Marconi et al, 2001;Tanné-Gariépy et al, 2002;BattagliaMayer et al, 2003). Instead, we prefer to attribute the observed large frontoparietal LDs to the dynamic reorganization of network activity, which is required in visuospatially organized areas like PRR in the case of spatial remapping.…”
Section: Shorter Motor-goal Latencies In Pmd Than Prr In Remapping Cosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These and other similarities raise the possibility of a number of homologous areas in PPC of prosimian and anthropoid primates. However, visual inputs to PPC in galagos seem to be largely limited to cortex caudal to the complex movement zones, whereas movement-related zones of VIP, LIP, and PRR of macaques all get inputs from subdivisions of visual cortex (8,10,13,14). Thus, the large posterior parietal region of macaques is also likely to differ in organization in some respects from the much smaller posterior parietal region of galagos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because VIP has interconnections with ventral premotor cortex (9)(10)(11)(12), possibly including cortex where the defensive zone of frontal cortex is located, the VIP region and part of premotor cortex may be critical nodes in a network mediating defensive behaviors (2). Furthermore, because PPC, including the intraparietal region, contains a number of proposed subdivisions with differing connection patterns with motor and premotor cortex (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), other parts of PPC might interact with parts of frontal cortex as nodes in systems for various biologically relevant complex behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early learning period was associated with activation of the dorsal and ventral visual streams and the dorsal premotor cortex (Burnod et al 1999;Caminiti and Johnson 1992;Caminiti et al 1996Caminiti et al , 1998Caminiti et al , 1999Lacquaniti et al 1995), and it may reflect the tuning of sensorimotor transformations that map, for example, visuospatial signals into motor commands. The important role of the superior parietal lobule in this graphomotor sequence task is consonant with earlier studies involving graphomotor learning (Seitz et al 1994(Seitz et al , 1997.…”
Section: Successive Recruitment Of Cortical Basal Ganglia and Cerebementioning
confidence: 99%