Abstract:This paper looks at a key aspect of numeracy, quantification, the process for determining how many things are in a group. Things can be quantified by counting or by subitizing (knowing just by looking). Many mathematics educators see counting as the first step towards more advanced mathematical understanding. However, there is some evidence to suggest that, for some children, subitizing is well-established before counting. There seems to be reasonable agreement that children need to understand about the relati… Show more
“…Many studies have implicitly or explicitly examined the role of pattern and structure in young children's understanding of number concepts and processes such as counting, subitising, partitioning, and numeration (Wright, 1994;Young-Loveridge, 2002). In their studies on numeration, Cobb, Gravemeijer, Yackel, McClain, and Whitenack (1997) described first graders' coordination of units of 10 and 1 in terms of the structure of collections.…”
Section: Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Nes (2008) also found a strong link between developing number sense and spatial structuring in Kindergartners' finger patterns and subitising structures. Studies of partitioning and part-whole reasoning (Lamon, 1996;Young-Loveridge, 2002) indicate the importance of unitising and spatial structuring in developing fraction knowledge.…”
“…Many studies have implicitly or explicitly examined the role of pattern and structure in young children's understanding of number concepts and processes such as counting, subitising, partitioning, and numeration (Wright, 1994;Young-Loveridge, 2002). In their studies on numeration, Cobb, Gravemeijer, Yackel, McClain, and Whitenack (1997) described first graders' coordination of units of 10 and 1 in terms of the structure of collections.…”
Section: Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Nes (2008) also found a strong link between developing number sense and spatial structuring in Kindergartners' finger patterns and subitising structures. Studies of partitioning and part-whole reasoning (Lamon, 1996;Young-Loveridge, 2002) indicate the importance of unitising and spatial structuring in developing fraction knowledge.…”
“…In contrast to children who use counting by ones, in this solution none of the numbers need to be counted out to have meaning. This can be described as a part-whole construction of number (Resnick, 1983;Hunting, 2003;Young-Loveridge, 2002) --the ability to partition a whole number into number parts. Such part-whole thinking indicates a construction of the number sequence as a "bidirectional chain" (Fuson, 1992); or as an Explicitly Nested Number Sequence (Steffe & Cobb, 1988).…”
Section: Facile Addition and Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development from counting strategies to facile non-counting strategies for addition and subtraction in the range 1 to 20 is regarded as an important accomplishment of early childhood mathematics (Resnick, 1983;Wright, 1994;Young-Loveridge, 2002). As well as facilitating calculation in the range 1 to 20, the non-counting strategies and part-whole thinking are required to calculate in higher decades (Heirdsfield, 2001;Treffers, 1991), and to understand multiplication and fractions (Olive, 2001;Resnick, 1983).…”
Section: Intervention Instruction For Facile Addition and Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the emergent modelling heuristic, we use instructional settings in which students can first structure context-bound models of combinations--such as identifying 5 red and 3 green dots as 8 dots--and then, reflect on their activity and generalise toward more formal reasoning about numbers--such as partitioning 8 into 5 + 3 to solve the written task 8 -3 without counting. We use the ten-frame setting for the range 1-10 (Bobis, 1996;Treffers, 1991;Young-Loveridge, 2002), and the arithmetic rack for the range 1-20 (Gravemeijer et al, 2000;Treffers, 1991) (see Instructional Settings below), settings which suggest a combination line-group structuring. Wright and colleagues (2006) have developed instructional procedures with these settings specifically for oneon-one interventions.…”
Section: Instructional Approach For Structuring Numbersmentioning
The Numeracy Intervention Research Project (NIRP) aims to develop assessment and instructional tools for use with low-attaining 3rd-and 4ill-graders. The NIRP approach to instruction in addition and subtraction in the range 1 to 20 is described. The approach is based on a notion of structuring numbers, which draws on the work of Freudenfllal and the Realistic Mathematics Education program. NIRP involved 25 teachers and 300 students, 200 of whom participated in an intervention program of approximately fllirty 25-minute lessons over 10 weeks. Data is drawn from case studies of two intervention students who made significant progress toward facile addition and subtraction. Pre-and post-assessment interviews and five lesson episodes are described, and data drawn from the activity of the students during the episodes are analysed. The discussion develops a detailed account of the progression of students' learning of structuring numbers, and how fllis can result in significant level-raising of students' ariffu'netical knowledge as it becomes more formalised and less contextdependent.In early addition and subtraction in the range 1 to 20, students can progress from using strategies involving counting by ones to using more facile strategies that do not involve counting. Researchers recognise this progression to facile addition and subtraction as critical mathematical learning, yet many low-attaining students do not make the progression successfully. There is a pressing need to understand how low-attaining students can progress to facile addition and subtraction, and to design instruction that facilitates such progress.As part of a design research project investigating intervention in number learning in 3rd and 4th grade, we have been developing instruction in addition and subtraction based on Dutch approaches to structuring numbers (Freudenthal, 1991). This article comprises one iteration in our design cycle, as we analyse student learning in the context of our experimental intervention instruction. The purpose of this paper is to formulate students' development toward facile addition and subtraction as an activity of structuring numbers. We aim to articulate the activity of structuring numbers, and how it can result in significant advancement in students' arithmetical knowledge. Such an analysis can in turn inform our refinement of the instructional design.In this article we first review research on early addition and subtraction, and the need for intervention. We then present the notion of structuring numbers, and our structuring numbers approach to instruction, drawing on the work of Freudenthal and his successors, which serve as the theoretical framework for our analysis of students' learning. We then describe the larger research project from which the data presented in this article are drawn. Learning episodes from case studies of two students in intensive Structuring Numbers 1 to 20 51 intervention, who made significant progress toward facile addition and subtraction, are presented. In the data analysis and discussio...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.