2017
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Childhood Home Visiting

Abstract: High-quality home-visiting services for infants and young children can improve family relationships, advance school readiness, reduce child maltreatment, improve maternal-infant health outcomes, and increase family economic self-sufficiency. The American Academy of Pediatrics supports unwavering federal funding of state home-visiting initiatives, the expansion of evidence-based programs, and a robust, coordinated national evaluation designed to confirm best practices and cost-efficiency. Community home visitin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes significantly expanding and funding Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), a universal public healthcare plan, and a variety of evidence-based programs that decrease costs by leveraging preventative health services. For example, home visiting programs are well-studied, evidence-based interventions that significantly improve childhood outcomes while reducing healthcare costs (Avellar & Supplee, 2013;Duffee et al, 2017;Olds et al, 2014). Expanding the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV Program), mandating it as a reimbursable service, and fully and continuously funding it through Medicaid, the federal government, and private insurance companies (Herzfeldt-Kamprath, Calsyn, & Huelskoetter, 2017) would greatly improve health outcomes for our nation's children and families.…”
Section: Implications For Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes significantly expanding and funding Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), a universal public healthcare plan, and a variety of evidence-based programs that decrease costs by leveraging preventative health services. For example, home visiting programs are well-studied, evidence-based interventions that significantly improve childhood outcomes while reducing healthcare costs (Avellar & Supplee, 2013;Duffee et al, 2017;Olds et al, 2014). Expanding the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV Program), mandating it as a reimbursable service, and fully and continuously funding it through Medicaid, the federal government, and private insurance companies (Herzfeldt-Kamprath, Calsyn, & Huelskoetter, 2017) would greatly improve health outcomes for our nation's children and families.…”
Section: Implications For Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the recommendations proposed by the original ACE study authors is the use of home visiting programs to assist parents in developing closer relationships with their children from birth to 3 years (Felitti et al, ). Evidence‐based status is increasingly required for public backing and sustained funding of maternal/child home visiting (Duffee, Mendelsohn, Kuo, Legano, & Earls, ; National Conference of State Legislators, ). Therefore, the Field Nursing team informed their model design through an additional exploration of research related to evidence‐based practice in PHN home visiting programs and measurement of relevant outcome measures.…”
Section: Adverse Childhood Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrated program effectiveness as evidenced by achievement of positive outcomes over time remains the gold standard for home visiting investment (Duffee et al, ). This has proven to be a significant limitation in evaluating traditional PHN home visiting programs whose crisis driven referrals result in varied lengths of time each client is enrolled, as well as differing levels of engagement within the program.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familienhausbesuchsprogramme wurden international intensiv beforscht [31,32]. In der vorliegenden Studie handelt es sich um eine retrospektive epidemiologische Querschnittsstudie, die eine Bewertung von Populationsunterschieden bezüglich Einflussfaktoren und der Stärke des Zusammenhangs zulässt.…”
Section: Limitationenunclassified