Early Brain Sensitivity to Word Frequency and Lexicality During Reading Aloud and Implicit Reading

Abstract

The present study investigated the influence of lexical word properties on the early stages of visual word processing (<250 ms) and how the dynamics of lexical access interact with task-driven top-down processes. We compared the brain’s electrical response (event-related potentials, ERPs) of 39 proficient adult readers for the effects of word frequency and word lexicality during an explicit reading task versus a visual immediate-repetition detection task where no linguistic intention is required. In general, we observed that left-lateralized processes linked to perceptual expertise for reading are task independent. Moreover, there was no hint of a word frequency effect in early ERPs, while there was a lexicality effect which was modulated by task demands: during implicit reading, we observed larger N1 negativity in the ERP to real words compared to pseudowords, but in contrast, this modulation by stimulus type was absent for the explicit reading aloud task (where words yielded the same activation as pseudowords). Thus, data indicate that the brain’s response to lexical properties of a word is open to influences from top-down processes according to the representations that are relevant for the task, and this occurs from the earliest stages of visual recognition (within ~200 ms). We conjectured that the loci of these early top-down influences identified for implicit reading are probably restricted to lower levels of processing (such as whole word orthography) rather than the process of lexical access itself.

How Do We Segment Text? Two-Stage Chunking Operation in Reading

“…3C). Orthographic typicality and lexicality modulate reading responses around 100 ms (Hauk et al, 2006;Faísca et al, 2019), which is also consistent with the detection timing in our observations.…”

Reliability, Validity and Standardization of the Reading Test: Sentence Comprehension

“…The test has also been used as an exclusion criterion for children with reading difficulty (e.g. Faísca et al, 2019;Mussolin et al, 2010;Reybroeck & Hupet, 2009). The interest in L3, apart from its conceptual framework, psychometric properties, and ease of administration, is due to its existing adaptation for the Collective Test of Reading Efficacy [Test Colectivo de Eficacia Lectora (TECLE)] in Spanish (Carrillo & Marín, 2009) and the Reading Age Test [Teste de Idade de Leitura (TIL)] in European Portuguese (Sucena & Castro, 2010).…”

Frequency Effects on Spelling Error Recognition: An ERP Study

“…High-frequency words are familiar to more people and are processed faster than low-frequency words (Monsell et al, 1989). The frequency effect has been identified in many languages: English (Rayner, 1998), Portuguese (Faísca et al, 2019), French (Segui et al, 1982), Chinese (Yan et al, 2006), and Russian (Laurinavichyute et al, 2019). Word frequency influences the temporal course of semantic and phonological activation in word recognition (Zhang et al, 2009).…”