2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06165-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early bacterial co-infection in ARDS related to COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
70
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
12
70
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If the high rate of coinfection with S. aureus has been well described in Flu [ 4 ], first reported cohorts do not mention bacterial co-infection as a common feature of COVID-19 with pneumonia [ 5 ]. Our findings are consistent with those of two recent series which focused on the early bacterial coinfection associated with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, and highlighted that S. aureus was one of the main identified microorganism, using molecular diagnostic tests alone or in association with conventional tests [ 6 , 7 ]. Interestingly, procalcitonin level did not differ between the patients with and without associated bacterial coinfection, as already reported by Kreitmann et al [ 7 ] raising the question of the usefulness of this biomarker to help for identifying early bacterial coinfection during COVID-19 pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If the high rate of coinfection with S. aureus has been well described in Flu [ 4 ], first reported cohorts do not mention bacterial co-infection as a common feature of COVID-19 with pneumonia [ 5 ]. Our findings are consistent with those of two recent series which focused on the early bacterial coinfection associated with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, and highlighted that S. aureus was one of the main identified microorganism, using molecular diagnostic tests alone or in association with conventional tests [ 6 , 7 ]. Interestingly, procalcitonin level did not differ between the patients with and without associated bacterial coinfection, as already reported by Kreitmann et al [ 7 ] raising the question of the usefulness of this biomarker to help for identifying early bacterial coinfection during COVID-19 pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed a higher incidence of nosocomial infections compared to those reported in some recent meta-analysis [5,6,12]. However, when we compared our results with those of studies that only included COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU, we observed more similar results [11,[13][14][15][16]. The occurrence of a nosocomial infection was a late complication, occurring after a median of more than one week of ICU stay.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We observed a higher incidence of nosocomial infections compared to those reported in some recent meta-analysis [ 5 , 6 , 16 , 17 ]. However, when we compared our results with those of studies that only included COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU, we observed more similar results with incidences ranging between 27 and 37% in several reports [ 15 , 18 – 21 ]. The occurrence of a nosocomial infection was a late complication, occurring after a median of more than 1 week of ICU stay.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%