2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Back-to-Africa Migration into the Horn of Africa

Abstract: Genetic studies have identified substantial non-African admixture in the Horn of Africa (HOA). In the most recent genomic studies, this non-African ancestry has been attributed to admixture with Middle Eastern populations during the last few thousand years. However, mitochondrial and Y chromosome data are suggestive of earlier episodes of admixture. To investigate this further, we generated new genome-wide SNP data for a Yemeni population sample and merged these new data with published genome-wide genetic data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
107
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(185 reference statements)
20
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also of note is the modest variation in their PC1 scores. This is likely due to ancient admixture with Middle Eastern populations (Hodgson et al 2014). These results confirm that Ethiopians have a unique genetic structure among African populations.…”
Section: Structure Of Individuals Run On the Afr Arraysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Also of note is the modest variation in their PC1 scores. This is likely due to ancient admixture with Middle Eastern populations (Hodgson et al 2014). These results confirm that Ethiopians have a unique genetic structure among African populations.…”
Section: Structure Of Individuals Run On the Afr Arraysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The signal of an ancient bottleneck in the Q1 (Bedouin) is not unexpected given previous analyses of genomic admixture that (Omberg et al 2012) and studies of worldwide population structure, which have inferred that the Q1 (Bedouin) genomes have the greatest proportion of Arab genetic ancestry, even when compared to Bedouins from outside Qatar and to Arabs in surrounding countries, including Yemen and Saudi Arabia (Hodgson et al 2014;Shriner et al 2014). To confirm a similarly minute amount of African admixture for the Q1 (Bedouin) in our sample, we applied three methodologies: (1) an ADMIXTURE (Alexander et al 2009) analysis of the genome-wide ancestry proportions in the 104 Qataris, the 1000 Genomes Project (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium 2012), and Human Origins samples (Lazaridis et al 2014); (2) an ALDER (Loh et al 2013) analysis of the proportion and timing of African ancestry in these same populations; and (3) a SupportMix (Omberg et al 2012) analysis of the population assignments of local genomic segments of the 96 Q1 (Bedouin), Q2 (Persian-South Asian), or Q3 (African) Qatari genomes.…”
Section: Admixture Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Second, the combination of lower levels of Neanderthal admixture in the Q1 (Bedouin) than European/Asian populations and the outgroup position of the Q1 (Bedouin) compared to non-Africans in the pairwaise similarity clustering of high-density variants measured genome-wide, place the Q1 (Bedouin) as being the most distant relatives of other contemporary non-Africans. Given that the Q1 (Bedouin) have the greatest proportion of Arab genetic ancestry measured in contemporary populations (Hodgson et al 2014;Shriner et al 2014) and are among the best genetic representatives of the autochthonous population on the Arabian Peninsula, these two conclusions therefore point to the Bedouins being direct descendants of the earliest split after the out-of-Africa migration events that established a basal Eurasian population (Lazaridis et al 2014). This is also consistent with the majority of Q1 (Bedouin) being able to trace a significant portion of their autosomal ancestry through lineages that never left the peninsula after the out-of-Africa migration events since such deep ancestry would not be expected if the entire Arabian Peninsula population had been reestablished from Africa or a non-African population at a later point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose starting effective population sizes (at the time of admixture) of 100, 200 and 500, and population growth parameters of 2, 5 and 10%, all of which are probably lower than those that reflect the true demographic history of Madagascar (hence, overestimating the amount of drift, and conservative with respect to our alternative hypothesis). [33]. Given 30 year generation times, these choices correspond to hypothetical admixture beginning at approximately 1000, 1300 and 2300 years ago, respectively.…”
Section: (C) Computer Simulations To Test Evolutionary Hypotheses Formentioning
confidence: 99%