2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06239-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Assessment Window for Predicting Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy using Biomarkers, Ultrasound, and Diffuse Optical Tomography

Abstract: Background:Neoadjuvant Therapy (NAT) permits less aggressive breast and axillary surgery and better assessment of systemic response. Establishing accurate and early predictors of NAT response would help limit morbidity of ineffective regimens through modi cation of treatment regimens and thereby optimize clinical outcomes. The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of tumor biomarkers, ultrasound (US) and US-guided diffuse optical tomography (DOT) in early prediction of breast cancer response to NAT. M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated DOSI data to be a prospective marker that reflects pathological tumor response at various times from the NACT starts [ 21 , 24 , 29 33 ] . The combined use of DOSI and assessment of the dynamics of tumor volume by the US, as well as taking into account tumor immunophenotype, made it possible to increase the predictive capabilities of the method [ 34 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated DOSI data to be a prospective marker that reflects pathological tumor response at various times from the NACT starts [ 21 , 24 , 29 33 ] . The combined use of DOSI and assessment of the dynamics of tumor volume by the US, as well as taking into account tumor immunophenotype, made it possible to increase the predictive capabilities of the method [ 34 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score is obtained by adding the staining score and intensity score. Any score between 0 and 2 is considered ER or PR negative; any score above 2 is considered ER or PR positive [ 19 ]. A case was considered positive when staining for ER and PR was found in 10% or more of tumor cells [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these criteria, MP5 is considered as pCR with no malignant cells; MP4 is a very good response with <10% of malignant cells remaining, near the pCR; in MP3 the significant loss of tumor cells is too variable between 30 and 90%; MP2 shows a reduction of tumor cells < 30%, and MP1 has no reduction in malignant cells. Herein, we defined a response group (MP grades 4-5) and a nonresponse group (MP grades 1-3) according to the prognostic potential of the MP grading system [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Response Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%