2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early adulthood body mass index, cumulative smoking, and esophageal adenocarcinoma survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A limited number of studies have investigated the association between tobacco smoking and survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and their results are in agreement with our findings [10][11][12][13]. In a meta-analysis by McMenamin et al, these studies were combined and there was no significant difference in survival outcomes when comparing current (HR 0.99 95% CI 0.73-1.36) or former (HR 0.88 95% CI 0.68-1.14) smokers with never smokers, respectively [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limited number of studies have investigated the association between tobacco smoking and survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and their results are in agreement with our findings [10][11][12][13]. In a meta-analysis by McMenamin et al, these studies were combined and there was no significant difference in survival outcomes when comparing current (HR 0.99 95% CI 0.73-1.36) or former (HR 0.88 95% CI 0.68-1.14) smokers with never smokers, respectively [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although there has been shown to be no association between alcohol consumption and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk [9], it is worthwhile investigating if alcohol consumption plays a role in prognosis as it is an easily modifiable risk factor and is known to have a synergistic effect with cigarette smoking in other cancers. However, only four published studies, including relatively small numbers of patients, have investigated the association between tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and esophageal adenocarcinoma survival [10][11][12][13]. Our working group has published a recent meta-analysis combining two of these studies, which demonstrated no significant difference in esophageal adenocarcinoma survival in neveralcohol drinkers compared to moderate alcohol drinkers (HR 1.34 95% CI 0.95-1.89) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed descriptions of recruitment procedures can be found in studyspecific publications. 32,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Institutional review board or research ethics committee approval was obtained by each sponsoring institution.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This association is consistent with findings from previous meta analyses such as HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.22,1.64) [21] for smoking status at time of diagnosis in mainly ESCC patients and HR 1.19 (95% CI 1.04,1.36) for ever smoking [4] in ESCC (although no evidence of association in EAC). Some more recently published studies found similar statistically significant HRs including HR = 1.28 [22] and HR = 1.34 [23] both from China, and HR = 1.22 from a study across two sites in US and Canada [24]. In contrast, recent results from Japan HR = 0.97 [25] failed to find evidence of association between pre-diagnosis smoking and post-diagnosis survival time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One review found pre-diagnosis obesity could be associated with higher risks of death in cancer (specifically breast, prostate and colorectal cancers) [27] but a later study reported that pre-diagnostic obesity increased hazard for all cancers except cancers of the upper digestive tract (obese compared to normal weight HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62,1.22) [28]. More recently a North American study [24] found recalled obesity in early adulthood was associated with lower survival times than normal weight (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.25, 2.51). The measure of obesity available in this study may not be optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%