2022
DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earlier cancer diagnosis in primary care: a feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!

Abstract: BackgroundUK cancer survival rates are much lower compared with other high-income countries. In primary care, there are opportunities for general practitioners (GPs) and other healthcare professionals to act more quickly in response to presented symptoms that might represent cancer. ThinkCancer! is a complex behaviour change intervention aimed at primary care practice teams to improve the timely diagnosis of cancer.AimTo explore the costs of delivering the ThinkCancer! intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential barriers highlighted include issues around digital exclusion, availability of language translation services, and challenges navigating an already complex healthcare system. The economic impact of remote consulting also received consideration through Anthony et al ’s 4 feasibility economic analysis of ‘ThinkCancer!’, a complex behaviour change intervention to improve the timely diagnosis of cancer. The study reports successful remote delivery of the intervention and follow-up at an average cost of £1317 per practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential barriers highlighted include issues around digital exclusion, availability of language translation services, and challenges navigating an already complex healthcare system. The economic impact of remote consulting also received consideration through Anthony et al ’s 4 feasibility economic analysis of ‘ThinkCancer!’, a complex behaviour change intervention to improve the timely diagnosis of cancer. The study reports successful remote delivery of the intervention and follow-up at an average cost of £1317 per practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%