2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eagle-eyed Visual Acuity in Autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study could not confirm the eagle-eyed VA hypothesis of autism as postulated by Ashwin et al (2009a, b). VA in ASD was consistent with the one measured in TYP and SCH when using a short viewing distance, the default number of trials and no “post-hoc maximum likelihood analysis” in FrACT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study could not confirm the eagle-eyed VA hypothesis of autism as postulated by Ashwin et al (2009a, b). VA in ASD was consistent with the one measured in TYP and SCH when using a short viewing distance, the default number of trials and no “post-hoc maximum likelihood analysis” in FrACT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In their reply, Ashwin et al (2009b) explained their intent when making changes to the FrACT defaults and acknowledge that a chain of unrelated events may have affected the magnitude of the VA measures obtained, but not the existence of the difference between individuals with ASD and controls. They argue that both groups were tested under the same settings in randomized order and that the FrACT is obviously blind to diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%