1997
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.29.18367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E2F-mediated Growth Regulation Requires Transcription Factor Cooperation

Abstract: Previous studies have indicated that the presence of an E2F site is not sufficient for G 1 /S phase transcriptional regulation. For example, the E2F sites in the E2F1 promoter are necessary, but not sufficient, to mediate differential promoter activity in G 0 and S phase. We have now utilized the E2F1 minimal promoter to test several hypotheses that could account for these observations. To test the hypothesis that G 1 /S phase regulation is achieved via E2F-mediated repression of a strong promoter, a variety o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presence of E2F and Sp1/Sp3 in cells is not sufficient to activate a transcriptionally silent MYCN gene. This is a surprising result given that the transactivation domain of E2F-1 can stimulate both transcriptional initiation and elongation (51) and can confer cell-cycle control when brought to a promoter by the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (48). In fact, based on this observation, it was proposed that cooperating transcription factors such as Sp1 are mainly required to achieve stable interaction of E2F with the target promoter (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the presence of E2F and Sp1/Sp3 in cells is not sufficient to activate a transcriptionally silent MYCN gene. This is a surprising result given that the transactivation domain of E2F-1 can stimulate both transcriptional initiation and elongation (51) and can confer cell-cycle control when brought to a promoter by the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (48). In fact, based on this observation, it was proposed that cooperating transcription factors such as Sp1 are mainly required to achieve stable interaction of E2F with the target promoter (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is a surprising result given that the transactivation domain of E2F-1 can stimulate both transcriptional initiation and elongation (51) and can confer cell-cycle control when brought to a promoter by the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (48). In fact, based on this observation, it was proposed that cooperating transcription factors such as Sp1 are mainly required to achieve stable interaction of E2F with the target promoter (48). This raises the question of why overexpressed E2F-1 in combination with endogenous Sp1/Sp3 failed to bind to the inactive MYCN promoter, while at the same time it bound to other target genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Below we will use the data on the transcriptional activity r normalized with respect to the activity (32) Note that the function a(y) reflecting the relative transcriptional activity is independent of the model parameter and depends only on the three parameters q R , , and .…”
Section: Thermostatistics-based Metric Of Cell-to-cell Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that E2F, YY1, and c MYC are potential cooperating factors (41). Thus, in our simulation, motif sites were generated according to the weight matrices of these three TFs based on TRANSFAC (42) matrix accession numbers, V$E2F 03, V$YY1 02, and V$MYCMAX 02, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%