Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3376044.3376062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-voting system using Blockchain technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hossain et al [4] developed an e-voting system using blockchain technology but didn't address the issue of voter privacy and complex computations. Shahzad and Crowcroft [5] proposed trustworthy electronic voting using adjusted blockchain technology, focusing on security aspects.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hossain et al [4] developed an e-voting system using blockchain technology but didn't address the issue of voter privacy and complex computations. Shahzad and Crowcroft [5] proposed trustworthy electronic voting using adjusted blockchain technology, focusing on security aspects.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale of such elections, coupled with the significance of their outcomes, makes them vulnerable to interference and security risks. While the adoption of e-voting in universities has shown promising results in terms of increased voter turnout and efficiency [4], university-level elections can also benefit from more reliable and secure e-voting systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we consolidated requirements addressing the same aspect but using synonymous terminology. For example, some authors used the term privacy [43] while others used anonymity [45] or secrecy [46]. Similarly, authors used the term usability [47] as a synonym for ease of use [8], accuracy [48], and correctness [49] for integrity [50], credibility [51] and trustworthiness [52] for reliability [53].…”
Section: Requirements Of Blockchain-based G2c E-government Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockchain can reduce a lot of efforts and resources invested in polling stations, specifying the areas, appointing staff, and preventing security risks at polling stations [1]. Holding a digital election through blockchain not only saves money but also reduces the risk of inequity in the voting process [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resources can be saved by hiring less staff, security forces, and arranging polling stations for a traditional voting system can be given to the miners [6]. It does not require a physical module/voting machine which always has a chance of cyber-attack through tampering devices [1]. The most ambient part of this system is the transparency which make people guarantee that their votes are being used in the right means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%