1991
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889890008391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E.s.d.'s and estimated probable error obtained in Rietveld refinements with local correlations

Abstract: Estimated standard deviations which are obtained in Rietveld refinements are known to decrease towards zero with the recording step, but serial correlations appear at the same time. A simple calculation which takes into account local correlations has been developed to furnish a reliable estimate of the values they would have if these correlations vanish.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
265
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
265
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows crystallographic data and details of the Rietveld refinement of γ-Ca 3 N 2 and Table 2 displays the occupied Wyckoff sites, refined atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters. Estimated standard deviations are calculated in agreement with ref 42.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows crystallographic data and details of the Rietveld refinement of γ-Ca 3 N 2 and Table 2 displays the occupied Wyckoff sites, refined atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters. Estimated standard deviations are calculated in agreement with ref 42.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…229) space group symmetry (Table 5) and only atoms on the 2a-site (0, 0, 0) is proposed (Table 6). Estimated standard deviations are calculated in agreement with ref 42.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The observed and calculated patterns are illustrated in Figure 1, and crystal data are given in Table 1. It is obvious that a well-known problem of underestimated standard uncertainties in the Rietveld analysis exists (Bérar & Lelann 1991). Even after a correction by a program-proposed score-factor of 2.4686, standard uncertainties for kutinaite are still considered underestimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were corrected by multiplication on the correcting coefficients, M e.s.d. (see Table 1), calculated by means of Berrar's procedure [62] implemented in W inCSD. Additionally, for the CNG_AQ sample, two non-indexed reflections of an unknown phase were detected at 2θ = 25.88…”
Section: Experimental Details Of the Co 50 Ni 21 Ga 32 Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%