2021
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2021.1883829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-readiness measurement tool: Scale development and validation in a Malaysian higher educational context

Abstract: Increasing complexity towards harnessing the power of ICT on all levels has created uncertainty about higher educational technological capabilities and adequate strategies to develop e-readiness. In this study, an empirically grounded higher education e-readiness questionnaire in the domain of higher education was developed and validated. Exploratory factor analysis (n = 120) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (n = 336) was done which was presented in two forms; covariance model and the structural model.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important that training institutions identify and understand the divide among faculty (Soomro et al, 2020;Goh and Blake, 2021;Lakshmi, 2021) and actively work towards reducing the gap. One way to do this is to develop a checklist or questionnaire that identifies gaps at specific levels of the continuum of digitalization, such as the online tool used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that training institutions identify and understand the divide among faculty (Soomro et al, 2020;Goh and Blake, 2021;Lakshmi, 2021) and actively work towards reducing the gap. One way to do this is to develop a checklist or questionnaire that identifies gaps at specific levels of the continuum of digitalization, such as the online tool used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molla and Licker (2005a) propose that all the cases with missing data are deleted, a minimum eigen value of 1 serves as the cut-off value, all the subsequent operations' factors are excluded which have a factor loading of less 0.5 or were loaded more than once with a factor loading of more than 0.5, all the single item factors are excluded for the sake of parsimony; and component-wise the Varimax raw rotation factor is extracted. The author acknowledges other models developed elsewhere (Goh & Blake, 2021;Khan, Khurram, & Zubair, 2020;Farokhizadeh, et al 2019;Pal, Singh, & Dhaliwal, 2020) Data were tested for reliability using the Cronbach alpha, sample adequacy using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin's Measure of Sampling Adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. Cronbach alpha is expected, as a rule of thumb, to be above 0.7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cluster connected nine keywords -education, human, human experiment, leadership, learning, questionnaire, student, training, and teaching. Specifically, these articles explore e-readiness measurement tool usage for higher Education 4.0 (Goh & Blake, 2021), leadership style models in the Education 4.0 era (Kadiyono et al, 2020;Wahidin et al, 2020), and electronic learning features in Education 4.0 (Mansor et al, 2020). The most frequently cited article in this cluster with 60 citations is that by Bonfield et al (2020), which emphasised the Education 4.0 aspect of teaching and learning in the digital age.…”
Section: Countries With the Most Affiliation In Education 40 Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%