2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E.R.A.S. pathway in colorectal surgery in elderly: Our experience: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: There was no significant difference in morbidity, 90-day mortality, length of stay or readmission rate in patients aged over 75 years compared with younger patients. Old age does not represent a contraindication to the implementation of the E.R.A.S protocol in patients that underwent colorectal surgery. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO THE EXISTING LITERATURE?: In the literature there are not many studies that address the impact of older age in the treatment of colorectal disease in an ERAS program. The aging of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies compared ERPs with conventional care in an older age group [16, 24, 28] (Table 1). Ten studies compared ERPs in old versus young patient groups [17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35], while 2 studies compared ERPs in different older age groups [19, 32]. Three studies described ERPs in a single older age group [21, 34, 36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three studies compared ERPs with conventional care in an older age group [16, 24, 28] (Table 1). Ten studies compared ERPs in old versus young patient groups [17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35], while 2 studies compared ERPs in different older age groups [19, 32]. Three studies described ERPs in a single older age group [21, 34, 36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 7610 patients were included in all studies, of whom 3495 (46%) patients (those ≥65 years in whom an ERP was applied) were considered in this review. Four studies divided the older patients in different age groups [17–19, 32]. As a consequence, the 21 studies included in this review comprised 26 study groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways may help reduce postoperative morbidity and resource use in this high‐risk group. Recent studies demonstrate that these programs, which require active patient participation to achieve accelerated recovery goals, can be feasibly completed by elderly, frail patients and result in similar or even greater reductions in length of stay than for younger, healthier patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 9 Other studies report smaller differences or no differences at all. 10 12 A similar controversy exists regarding the long-term postoperative survival of elderly after surgical treatment for CRC. Some studies show a decreased survival in elderly patients with CRC compared with younger patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%