E-NOTES Transumbilical Cholecystectomy

Graur, Florin; Szasz, A; Negru, Robert D.; Neagos, H. C.; Elisei, Rossella; Muresan, A.; Furcea, Luminiţa

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22586-4_6

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite the usual considerations of the brightness evolution of SNe and their eventual disappearance over timescales following the decay of radioactive elements, there is an emerging picture, in particular for Type Ia SNe, that observations at later epochs may present a more complicated evolution (Yang et al 2018;Graur 2018) Based on the smooth evolution of the light curve, and the lack of a significant colour excess at the wavelengths associated with strong emission lines, we find no evidence to support the onset of interaction of the ejecta of SN 2011dh with a dense CSM after the last epochs of reported spectroscopy (Shivvers et al 2013). From Figure 2, it can be seen that both the decay of radioactive elements and the magnetar can provide reasonably good matches to the bolometric lightcurve.…”

Section: Which Energy Source Is Responsible?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Origin of the Late-time Luminosity of Supernova 2011dh

Maund

2019

ApJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the small amount of hydrogen (≤ 0.1M ) remaining on the surface of their progenitors, Type IIb supernovae are sensitive probes of the mass loss processes of massive stars towards the ends of their lives, including the role of binarity. We report late-time Hubble Space Telescope observations of SN 2011dh in M51, and a brief period of re-brightening and plateau in the photometric light curve, from 1.8 to 6.2 years after the explosion. These observations exclude the role of circumstellar interaction, however a slow rotating magnetar, a significant quantity of radioactive elements or a light echo could be responsible for the late-time luminosity observed at t > 1000d. If the late-time light curve is powered by the decay of radioactive elements, SN 2011dh is required to have produced ∼ 2.6 × 10 −3 M of 44 Ti, which is significantly in excess of the amount inferred from earlier nebular spectra of SN 2011dh itself or measured in the Cas A SN remnant. The evolution of the brightness and the colour of the late-time light curve also supports the role of a light echo originating from dust with a preferred geometry of a disk of extent ∼ 1.8 to ∼ 2.7 pc from the SN, consistent with a wind-blown bubble. Accounting for the long term photometric evolution due to a light echo, the flux contribution from a surviving binary companion at ultraviolet wavelengths can be isolated and corresponds to a star of ∼ 9−10M .

show abstract

Section: Which Energy Source Is Responsible?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Origin of the Late-time Luminosity of Supernova 2011dh

Maund

2019

ApJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With technological advances, surgeons have developed minimally-invasive procedures that provide safety and benefits for the patient. The use of natural orifices (NOTES -Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) has been described, as well as single-port appendectomy, also called transumbilical embryonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES), in which the embryonic scar is used to introduce a single port through this anatomical landmark, using conventional laparoscopy equipment, and thereby carry out the surgical procedure [5][6][7] . A recent development in appendectomy has been the introduction of less invasive single-incision laparoscopic surgery, which uses a single multi-luminal port or multiple mono-luminal ports through the same skin incision 8,9 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of factors associated with formation of intra-abdominal collections in single-port appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis

Cabrera‐Vargas¹,

Mendoza‐Zuchini²,

Bernal³

et al. 2023

CIRUE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To compare the decreases between the appendectomy by single port vs. multiport laparoscopy and to establish if there is a difference in the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal collection. Method: Retrospective study was carried out using 116 medical records of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy through a single port and multiport in two medical centers. Results: 12 (10.3%) patients developed an abdominal collection. No differences were found between the two techniques in terms of intra-abdominal collection development (p = 0.242), there was no difference between the two techniques in terms of intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.012), the surgical time was greater in the single-port group (17.4 min on average). 62.5% of patients with bleeding > 50 mL developed intra-abdominal collection. Conclusions: There was no evidence of the superiority of either of the two interventions in complicated appendicitis, but it does confirm that single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe, feasible, noninferior procedure and with similar complication rates compared to the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy technique.

show abstract

“…Con los avances tecnológicos, los cirujanos han desarrollado procedimientos mínimamente invasivos que proporcionan seguridad y beneficios para el paciente. Se ha descrito la utilización de orificios naturales (NOTES, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) y apendicectomías por puerto único, también llamada cirugía endoscópica transumbilical de orificio natural embrionario (E-NOTES), en las que se utiliza la cicatriz embrionaria para introducir por este reparo anatómico un puerto único, utilizando los equipos convencionales de laparoscopia, y de esta manera realizar el procedimiento quirúrgico [5][6][7] . Un desarrollo reciente en la apendicectomía ha sido la introducción de la cirugía laparoscópica de incisión única menos invasiva, que utiliza un único puerto multiluminal o múltiples puertos monoluminales, a través de una única incisión en la piel 8,9 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Evaluación de factores asociados a formación de colecciones intraabdominales en apendicectomía monopuerto para apendicitis aguda complicada

Cabrera¹,

Mendoza‐Zuchini²,

Bernal³

et al. 2021

CIRU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Comparar los desenlaces entre la apendicectomía por laparoscopia por puerto único y multipuerto, y establecer si existe diferencia en el riesgo de colección intraabdominal posoperatoria. Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional, mediante 116 historias clínicas de pacientes llevados a apendicectomía laparoscópica por único puerto y multipuerto en dos centros médicos. Resultados: Desarrollaron colección intraabdominal 12 (10.3%) pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias entre ambas técnicas en cuanto al desarrollo de colección intraabdominal (p = 0.242), no hubo diferencia entre ambas técnicas en cuanto a sangrado intraoperatorio (p = 0.012) y el tiempo quirúrgico fue mayor en el grupo de puerto único (17.4 minutos en promedio). El 62.5% de los pacientes con sangrado > 50 ml desarrollaron colección intraabdominal. Conclusiones: No se evidenció superioridad de ninguna de las dos intervenciones en apendicitis complicada, pero sí se confirma que la apendicectomía laparoscópica por puerto único es un procedimiento seguro, factible, no inferior y con tasas similares de complicaciones en comparación con la técnica convencional de apendicectomía laparoscópica.

show abstract

E-NOTES Transumbilical Cholecystectomy

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

The Origin of the Late-time Luminosity of Supernova 2011dh

The Origin of the Late-time Luminosity of Supernova 2011dh

Evaluation of factors associated with formation of intra-abdominal collections in single-port appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis

Evaluación de factores asociados a formación de colecciones intraabdominales en apendicectomía monopuerto para apendicitis aguda complicada

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About