2016 European Navigation Conference (ENC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/euronav.2016.7530566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

e-Navigation based cooperative collision avoidance at sea: The MTCAS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following that close quarters have been defined in [38], where the author observed that COLREGS [39,40] do not precisely instruct navigators on specific distances in which the evasive action is necessary. Such distances were thus determined in [41] and recently applied in Maritime Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System [42,43]. Safe distances of evasive actions were also investigated in [44].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following that close quarters have been defined in [38], where the author observed that COLREGS [39,40] do not precisely instruct navigators on specific distances in which the evasive action is necessary. Such distances were thus determined in [41] and recently applied in Maritime Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System [42,43]. Safe distances of evasive actions were also investigated in [44].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, artificial ship collision avoidance mainly depends on ship position and motion relationship to determine the collision avoidance opportunity and make collision avoidance decisions using methods such as a ship domain-based approach [6], time to the closest point of approach (TCPA) and distance at closest point of approach (DCPA) [7]. Collision avoidance of an unmanned surface vessel (USV) depends on sensor fusion methods [8][9][10][11], which are capable of detecting static and dynamic obstacles.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Ship Collision Avoidance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, lane deviation is not encouraged while navigating. Hence, this reward was denoted as a lane = λ lanein , in lane −λ laneout , lane deviation (7) where λ lanein denotes the reward when sailing in a waterway normally, and −λ laneout denotes the punishment when the ship has sailed out of the route.…”
Section: Markov Decision Process Of Multi-ship Cooperative Collision Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration the safe and secure navigation of the vessels, which is one of the main objectives of the "e-Navigation" strategy that is adopted by the IMO (IMO, 2007), additional efforts were pursued by researchers to develop a scheme that will allow the optimisation of course planning and the reduction of the traffic conjunction and collision accidents (Denker et al, 2016), and a technology that will identify the safe and dangerous navigational sectors and support the OOW in making correct decisions (TotemPlus, 2014). Furthermore, the NDSS-NAVDEC was developed, consisting of numerous modules that focus on the collection of data from shipboard and alternative resources, and the analysis assessment of the navigational situation of the own vessel (Pietrzykowski et al, 2012;Borkowski, 2014;Borkowski, 2017).…”
Section: Collision Avoidance Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%