1995
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199510)46:9<700::aid-asi6>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-journals and tenure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not surprising that the only tenure or promotion-related question directed to me as editor or guest editor of long-established print journals came from authors who wanted to know if their manuscripts had been accepted so they might include them as in-press publications in their applications. It is possible that Cronin and Overfelt's (1995) conclusion, albeit qualified, that "the issue of publication medium may well be a non-issue as far as promotion and tenure decisions are concerned" (703), is an accurate portrayal of decisions made in university tenure and promotion committee meetings; however, the value of new media scholarship continues to be debated (Ball, 2004;Rowlands & Nicholas, 2005). E-journals have changed scholarly publication (Nowick & Jenda, 2004), very quickly and probably irrevocably, and institutional policies will need to be revised accordingly.…”
Section: Drawbacks Of E-journals Reconsideredmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, it is not surprising that the only tenure or promotion-related question directed to me as editor or guest editor of long-established print journals came from authors who wanted to know if their manuscripts had been accepted so they might include them as in-press publications in their applications. It is possible that Cronin and Overfelt's (1995) conclusion, albeit qualified, that "the issue of publication medium may well be a non-issue as far as promotion and tenure decisions are concerned" (703), is an accurate portrayal of decisions made in university tenure and promotion committee meetings; however, the value of new media scholarship continues to be debated (Ball, 2004;Rowlands & Nicholas, 2005). E-journals have changed scholarly publication (Nowick & Jenda, 2004), very quickly and probably irrevocably, and institutional policies will need to be revised accordingly.…”
Section: Drawbacks Of E-journals Reconsideredmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Fourth, in recent years there has been a number of surveys of T&P guidelines, but these have usually sought to determine the extent to, and ways in which, electronic publications and media are viewed by promotion and tenure committees (e.g. Cronin and Overfelt, 1995;Sweeney, 2000;Andersen and Trinkle, 2001). This is a separate, though closely related topic, and we therefore checked for specific language relating to the acceptability of alternative media in assessing a candidate's suitability for tenure and promotion.…”
Section: Mickey Mousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passa, portanto, a fazer parte integrante também do sistema de reconhecimento científico (Cronin & Overfelt, 1995), concedendo visibilidade, contribuindo para a promoção da carreira acadêmica e científica e facilitando a obtenção de financiamentos junto a órgãos de fomento a pesquisa (Meadows, 1999;Ziman, 1979).…”
Section: Sistema Tradicional De Comunicação Científica: Reflexõesunclassified