2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-government in Alabama: An analysis of county voting and election website content, usability, accessibility, and mobile readiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If the machine does not work suddenly or there is damage, such as the result of the power outage, the person who has the right to fix should be determined clearly. It is not permissible for any person to do so because it concerns the confidentiality of data therein [14].…”
Section: B General Elections In Accordance With the Development Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the machine does not work suddenly or there is damage, such as the result of the power outage, the person who has the right to fix should be determined clearly. It is not permissible for any person to do so because it concerns the confidentiality of data therein [14].…”
Section: B General Elections In Accordance With the Development Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some academic treatments of the issue of election websites at the county-level in the United States (Harrell et al 2013). One notable recent example is an analysis of Alabama's county election websites (King and Youngblood 2016). The authors find a great deal of variation in the quality of these websites and conclude that most do not meet standards of usability, accessibility, and mobile readiness.…”
Section: Garnettmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] used six factors of usability which are usefulness, efficiency, effectiveness, learnability, satisfaction, and accessibility to evaluate the usability of the Central Science Library (CSL) website. Meanwhile, [12] build 15 web usability standards with six general areas which are overall design standards, hypertext, navigational standards, readability, language option, and findability in evaluated 34 websites from the list of Alabama counties which are specifically for voting and elections. Also, [13] used five usability categories which are overall design standards, conventions for hyperlinked text in the main text, navigational standards, findability, and readability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High usability of the digital government services shows that the government is committed to deliver their services to fulfil the citizens' needs and demands. There are some studies have been conducted regarding usability factors of the e-government or digital government where the majority of these services are about election and voting website, local government website [7,9,[12][13], e-learning [14], and digital library [15][16]. Besides, to our best knowledge, there are only a few studies in Malaysia context reporting on the usability of www.ijacsa.thesai.org higher education agencies' websites [17], and student information system [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%