2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-01855-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-FCNN for tiny facial expression recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TABLE 2. TABLE OF MODEL EXPERIMENT DATA Model Accuracy Parameters size VGG16 [5] 68.37% 138M DTGAN [10] 65.48% 5.8M Peak-Piloted [11] 65.64% 6.6M Frame2seq [7] 64.81% 2.6M Multi-C-Xception [12] 68.14% -E-FCNN [13] 66.17% -DAM-CNN [14] 65.31% -Ensemble-CNN [15] 73.73% -SIC-NET(Ours) 64.78% According to the experimental data in the table, the recognition accuracy of SIC-NET in the FER2013 dataset is 64.78%, and the number of model parameters is 1.2M. The recognition accuracy of SIC-NET is lower than that of other models, but the number of model parameters is the smallest and the real-time warning of the model is the best.…”
Section: Experiments Process and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TABLE 2. TABLE OF MODEL EXPERIMENT DATA Model Accuracy Parameters size VGG16 [5] 68.37% 138M DTGAN [10] 65.48% 5.8M Peak-Piloted [11] 65.64% 6.6M Frame2seq [7] 64.81% 2.6M Multi-C-Xception [12] 68.14% -E-FCNN [13] 66.17% -DAM-CNN [14] 65.31% -Ensemble-CNN [15] 73.73% -SIC-NET(Ours) 64.78% According to the experimental data in the table, the recognition accuracy of SIC-NET in the FER2013 dataset is 64.78%, and the number of model parameters is 1.2M. The recognition accuracy of SIC-NET is lower than that of other models, but the number of model parameters is the smallest and the real-time warning of the model is the best.…”
Section: Experiments Process and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results are shown in Figure 7. It turns out Methods Years Accuracy(%) Conv+Inception [30] 2016 66.40 SMFER [31] 2018 65.12 GoogleNet [32] 2018 65.20 VGG+SVM [33] 2019 66.31 SAP [34] 2019 71.08 E-FCNN [28] 2021 66.17 DeepEmotion [35] 2021 uses transfer learning technique to overcome the shortage of training samples. For FER2013, the second-highest recognition accuracy of the test set is SAP [34], which is a sample awareness-based expression recognition method, in which a Bayesian classifier is used to select the most appropriate classifier from a set of candidate classifiers for the current test sample, and then the classifier is used to perform expression recognition on the current sample.…”
Section: E Visualization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, the relevant universities in China used deep learning and other technologies to conduct in-depth research on the facial expressions of the subjects and the classroom teaching effect. Literature [8] erefore, on the basis of existing research, this paper focuses on the inner relationship between face detection and classroom teaching effect evaluation and focuses on constructing a feasible classroom teaching effect evaluation model and applying it to teaching practice.…”
Section: Correlation Between Facial Expression Recognition Andmentioning
confidence: 99%