2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E. coli Lipopolysaccharide: Acute oral toxicity study in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, oral administration of LPS is less common, perhaps because it is non-toxic to healthy mice even at doses 16.5X greater than that used here (Harper et al, 2011). Consistent with this report, we did not observe obvious signs of sickness, including changes in body position (hunched back, lying on side, or prone), sustained eye closure, piloerection, dragging or elevated tail position, or failure to respond to finger stroke of the back (Brown et al, 2005, Hines et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, oral administration of LPS is less common, perhaps because it is non-toxic to healthy mice even at doses 16.5X greater than that used here (Harper et al, 2011). Consistent with this report, we did not observe obvious signs of sickness, including changes in body position (hunched back, lying on side, or prone), sustained eye closure, piloerection, dragging or elevated tail position, or failure to respond to finger stroke of the back (Brown et al, 2005, Hines et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Systemic LPS induces the well-studied phenomena of sickness behavior (Asarian and Langhans, 2010), which includes anorexia, anhedonia, and taste aversion to sucrose (Cross-Mellor et al, 2004). Little is known about the behavioral consequences of ingested LPS, which is significantly less toxic than systemic LPS (Harper et al, 2011, Inagawa et al, 2011). Inhibiting sweet taste input to the CNS can alter preference for sweet taste stimuli, and ingestion of LPS-tainted solutions may have the same effect (Treesukosol et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While endotoxin limits for parenteral drugs have been established (19), there is no defined oral endotoxin limit dose. Oral administration of E. coli endotoxin to mice at a dose of up to 10 6 EU/mouse produced no evidence of toxicity (20). A different situation is encountered when oral phages infect the intestinal pathogen in the guts of diarrhea patients and release endo-and enterotoxins from the lysed pathogen in patients with a compromised gut barrier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the clinical trial, the requested purity was defined as an absence of contaminating non‐T4 coliphages (e.g., induced prophages from the production E. coli strain) and bacterial cell debris by electron micrographic (EM) observation in the final T4‐like clinical phage cocktail. An absence of bacterial endotoxin (LPS) requested for phage cocktails targeted for burn wounds in the Phagoburn PT trial (http://www.phagoburn.eu) was not requested for oral PT cocktails, since the gut is tolerant to LPS . A phage cocktail consisting of nine different T4‐like phages was stable over at least 2 years under refrigeration temperatures.…”
Section: Production Stability and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%