2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E. coli electroeradication on a closed loop circuit by using milli-, micro- and nanosecond pulsed electric fields: Comparison between energy costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study we show in vitro results for the efficacy of 600-ns PEF to inactivate Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus acidophilus. While the effects of nsPEF have been studied on E. coli (Chalise et al 2006;Perni et al 2007;Guionet et al 2014Guionet et al , 2015Novickij et al 2018) and other species such as Staphylococcus aureus (Chaturongakul and Kirawanich 2012; Vadlamani et al 2018;Novickij et al 2019), Salmonella typhimurium (Perni et al 2007) and Bacillus subtilis (Katsuki et al 2002); we chose to compare the effects of E. coli with L. acidophilus for two reasons. First, several studies have suggested that cell size and shape play a critical role in transmembrane potential charging and subsequent membrane pore formation (Kandušer and Miklavčič 2008;Khan and El-Hag 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study we show in vitro results for the efficacy of 600-ns PEF to inactivate Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus acidophilus. While the effects of nsPEF have been studied on E. coli (Chalise et al 2006;Perni et al 2007;Guionet et al 2014Guionet et al , 2015Novickij et al 2018) and other species such as Staphylococcus aureus (Chaturongakul and Kirawanich 2012; Vadlamani et al 2018;Novickij et al 2019), Salmonella typhimurium (Perni et al 2007) and Bacillus subtilis (Katsuki et al 2002); we chose to compare the effects of E. coli with L. acidophilus for two reasons. First, several studies have suggested that cell size and shape play a critical role in transmembrane potential charging and subsequent membrane pore formation (Kandušer and Miklavčič 2008;Khan and El-Hag 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He-O 2 plasma is the most efficient plasma for bacterial inactivation and seems to involve an electric field associated with the ionization front or, generated in the plasma environment. The inactivation of bacteria by electrochemical means has been well characterized [ 59 ]. It involves different mechanisms such as changes in the membrane potential which surely may lead to local ion flux imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, our system is adaptable as a continuous oil and polysaccharide extraction process at low energy cost. In the flow treatment process, electric field application to treat large volumes was examined for bacterial eradication and protein extraction from microalgae [ 9 , 10 , 12 , 40 ]. In particular, it is possible to design a system using a derivation to separate algae culture from a bioreactor, treat it by nsPEF, extract oil and polysaccharide by in-line decantation (lamellar decanter might help to lead single cells on the bottom part and matrix on the upper part), and then return the medium and surviving algae to the bioreactor, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once permeabilized, some intracellular elements may be extracted from cells; protein, for example, can be extracted from intracellular algae using PEF [ 9 11 ]. Regarding pulse length, nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have been shown to be more energy efficient than millisecond or microsecond pulsed electric fields (msPEF or µsPEF); as nsPEF pulses are shorter, they generally consume less energy even when applied voltages are higher [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%