2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyspnoea after antiplatelet agents: the AZD6140 controversy

Abstract: Recent randomised studies suggest that experimental oral reversible platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, AZD6140, causes dyspnoea. This also raises similar concerns about the parent compound, and another adenosine triphosphate (ATP) analogue (AR-69931MX or cangrelor), which is currently in Phase 3 trial in patients undergoing coronary interventions. We analysed package inserts, and available clinical trials safety data for antiplatelet agents with regard to the incidence of dyspnoea. We found that dyspnoea is a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware that we are purporting a hypothesis that is difficult to test for at least two reasons: i) the definition of the precise physical stimulus that causes dyspnea is problematic (32); ii) dyspnea is a sensation that can only be properly assessed in collaborating human beings (16) (these difficulties likely explain why previous pathogenic hypotheses that have been published [33] have not been successfully tested yet). Due to these difficulties, and considering that C fibers can react to various stimuli, which may be thermal, mechanical or chemical in nature (34), we are planning to test our hypothesis in preliminary experiments, in which the effects of different P2Y 12 inhibiting drugs on surrogate end-points, such as thermal and tactile sensations, will be measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware that we are purporting a hypothesis that is difficult to test for at least two reasons: i) the definition of the precise physical stimulus that causes dyspnea is problematic (32); ii) dyspnea is a sensation that can only be properly assessed in collaborating human beings (16) (these difficulties likely explain why previous pathogenic hypotheses that have been published [33] have not been successfully tested yet). Due to these difficulties, and considering that C fibers can react to various stimuli, which may be thermal, mechanical or chemical in nature (34), we are planning to test our hypothesis in preliminary experiments, in which the effects of different P2Y 12 inhibiting drugs on surrogate end-points, such as thermal and tactile sensations, will be measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenesis of dyspnea during ticagrelor treatment is unclear, although it has been hypothesized that it may be mediated by adenosine. 42 A substudy of DISPERSE-2 showed that ticagrelor inhibited platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent fashion and that both doses achieved greater levels of inhibition than clopidogrel. 43 In addition, ticagrelor produced further suppression of platelet aggregation in patients who were currently receiving clopidogrel.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ticagrelor With Clopidogrelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, dyspnea is not only considered a serious adverse event but it also represents a heavy economic burden, with an average cost of USD 6,958 per single outpatient visit [2]. Historically, dyspnea did not appear to represent a safety concern for any of the antiplatelet agents [3], until the introduction of ticagrelor in 2011. Few anecdotal observations suggested that aspirin [4], hirudin [5], or eptifibatide [6] may be associated with dyspnea.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%