Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9629(15)40833-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyspnea Scales in the Assessment of Illiterate Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we compare with BDI, VAS measures dyspnoea superficially. In a study made by Martinez et al. (2000), they used four dyspnoea scales (VAS, BDI, Borg and Numerical Rating Scale) to evaluate dyspnoea in literate and illiterate patients with COPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we compare with BDI, VAS measures dyspnoea superficially. In a study made by Martinez et al. (2000), they used four dyspnoea scales (VAS, BDI, Borg and Numerical Rating Scale) to evaluate dyspnoea in literate and illiterate patients with COPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory symptoms, such as dyspnoea (duration and severity), sputum production, cough and wheezing, were assessed and used as additional confirmatory measurements regarding COPD diagnosis and assessment of disease severity. The baseline assessment was based on accepted diagnostic tools [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulmonary function parameters, like respiratory rate, arterial blood gases and spirometric values, do not show strong correlation with breathlessness, nor can they explain all the intensity of feelings. 32 There are no animal models for evaluating breathlessness. Therefore, studies of induced dyspnea in healthy volunteers are valid tools for investigating its physiopathological mechanisms and the potential therapeutic value of new medicines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%