2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-022-01275-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyspepsia with alarm symptoms in patients aged less than 60 years: Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy justified in Indian scenario?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that the optimal age to begin screening for malignancy in dyspepsia patients in India seems to be 46.5 years [89]. In another recent study from northern India on 294 patients with dyspepsia, the authors found that even among patients younger than 60 years with alarm features, a considerable number of patients had organic lesions (65%) including malignancy (16%) on upper GI endoscopy [90]. These authors chose a cut-off value of 60 years for age as the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) guidelines did not recommend upper GI endoscopy to investigate alarm features for dyspepsia patients under the age of 60 to exclude upper GI malignancy [91].…”
Section: Voting Summary: Accepted Completely: (100%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the optimal age to begin screening for malignancy in dyspepsia patients in India seems to be 46.5 years [89]. In another recent study from northern India on 294 patients with dyspepsia, the authors found that even among patients younger than 60 years with alarm features, a considerable number of patients had organic lesions (65%) including malignancy (16%) on upper GI endoscopy [90]. These authors chose a cut-off value of 60 years for age as the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) guidelines did not recommend upper GI endoscopy to investigate alarm features for dyspepsia patients under the age of 60 to exclude upper GI malignancy [91].…”
Section: Voting Summary: Accepted Completely: (100%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, statins which were our sample’s most used medications reported in 191 patients of 605 (32%), were not linked to SEFs. Moreover, a previous study suggested a protective role against endoscopic lesions, especially in aspirin consumers or patients with cardiovascular diseases, which might also explain the lack of correlation between our sample’s aspirin users and SEFs[ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%