Dyspepsia Management in Primary Care in The Netherlands: To What Extent Is Helicobacter pylori Diagnosis and Treatment Incorporated?

Abstract

Background: Many guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori (HP)-related dyspepsia have been launched over the past decade. The suggested policies in these guidelines are often more consensus- than evidence-based (test-and-treat policy, test and endoscope), which may cause confusion among primary-care physicians. Aim: To determine the current management of HP-related dyspepsia by Dutch general practitioners (GPs). Methods: A random sample of 5% of all Dutch GPs (n = 355) were sent a questionnaire on the diagnosis and treatment of HP infections in dyspepsia management. Results: The response rate was 66.2% (n = 235). Almost 80% of the responding GPs stated they had conducted HP testing (via endoscopy or serology) during the previous 12 months. In the same time period, more than 94% had actually prescribed a HP eradication therapy. A total of 70% of the GPs stated that they used endoscopy to test for HP infection, 54% used serology (ELISA); whole-blood tests and carbon urea breath tests were not used. Patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease, those on chronic acid-suppressive drugs and patients with recurrent ulcer-like complaints were most frequently tested for HP infection. Conclusions: Given the frequency of consultations for dyspepsia in primary care in the Netherlands (150 new dyspeptic patients per average practice per year), and the reported average number of HP tests perfomed (1–5 per GP per year), HP diagnosis plays a modest role in the management of dyspepsia in Dutch general practices. Neither the ‘test-and-treat’ policy recommended in the Maastricht guidelines, nor its advice regarding the choice of diagnostic tests (carbon urea breath test or serology), is being followed. The majority of GPs uses endoscopy for the detection of HP infection.

Do urea breath test (UBT) referrals for Helicobacter pylori testing match the clinical guidelines in primary care practice? A prospective observational study

“…This has led to the development and publication of international and national guidelines that present a unique challenge. The current study, as well as other studies from all over the world, demonstrate only partial adherence of medical communities to these guidelines recommendations [18,19].…”

Spanish primary care survey on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia: Information, attitudes, and decisions

“…Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection are two of the most relevant conditions on digestive-related consultations. [1][2][3] The infection by H. pylori is the most prevalent worldwide, chronically infecting an estimated 50% of the population, 4 a figure similar to that assumed for Spanish population, 5 being the main cause of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. Over the last decades, the management of H. pylori has migrated from gastroenterology to primary care.…”

Helicobacter Pylori “Test-and-Treat” Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review

“…196, 197 In contrast, educational outreach visits to clinicians and combinations of two or more interventions could increase the likelihood of affecting practice patterns. 196 Some authors have demonstrated that the combination of an educational session led by gastroenterology subspecialists and the availability of office-based H. pylori testing can increase acceptance of the test-and-treat strategy by primary care providers.…”