2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2021.105523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyson's crank and the mex of integer partitions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, m 1,2 (n) is the number of partitions of n with odd mex. In [23], it was productive to split the odd mex partitions modulo 4; in our notation, these are m 1,4 (n) and [23].) Next, we show that breaking these counts down further, by parity of partition length, shows new relations and allows for cleaner proofs of previous results.…”
Section: Connecting Mex and Crankmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, m 1,2 (n) is the number of partitions of n with odd mex. In [23], it was productive to split the odd mex partitions modulo 4; in our notation, these are m 1,4 (n) and [23].) Next, we show that breaking these counts down further, by parity of partition length, shows new relations and allows for cleaner proofs of previous results.…”
Section: Connecting Mex and Crankmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Other results of Hopkins, Sellers, and Stanton [23] show unexpected connections between the crank and another representation of integer partitions: The Frobenius symbol of a partition consists of two rows of strictly decreasing nonnegative integers. Given the Ferrers diagram of a partition, the top row of the Frobenius symbol gives the number of boxes to the right of the diagonal entries and the bottom row gives the number of boxes below the diagonal entries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The novelty of Theorem 1.10 is that it identifies the odd crank enumeration of partitions with those partitions into odd number of parts and self-conjugate partitions through Liouville's function λ. Following the work done in [6,18], Theorem 1.11 springs up rather organically. Here, we count Frobenius symbols with restrictions on the entries and equate them to the enumeration of number of partitions with no parts that equal the size of the Durfee square of that partition, two ideas in the theory of partitions that are very rarely correlated.…”
Section: Definition 14 ([7]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the following reformulation of a result provided by Hopkins, Sellers and Stanton in [6], we derive the generalization of Theorem 1.3 from Theorem 1.9 and Corollary 1.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%