2021
DOI: 10.1159/000516181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysfunctional Coping Mediates the Relationship between Stress and Mental Health in Health-Care Staff Working amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: Objective: The cross-sectional study aimed to assess the stress outcomes in health care staff working during the Covid-19 pandemic and to explore the role of coping in the relationship between stress outcomes and mental health dimensions with Preacher & Hayes's mediation analysis. Subjects and methods: 170 participants including physicians (n=41; 24.1%), nurses (n=114, 67.1%) and paramedics (n = 15, 8.8%) with a mean age of 37.69 ± 12,23 years and an average seniority of 14.40 ±12.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other studies, generally conducted in intensive settings or totally dedicated to COVID-19 positive patients (Murat, Köse, & Savas ¸er, 2021), lower stress levels were found in the sample analyzed, while compared to studies conducted on samples of nurses that were not totally firstly, comparable results were obtained (Chatzittofis, Karanikola, Michailidou, & Constantinidou, 2021;Warchoł-Biedermann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Compared to other studies, generally conducted in intensive settings or totally dedicated to COVID-19 positive patients (Murat, Köse, & Savas ¸er, 2021), lower stress levels were found in the sample analyzed, while compared to studies conducted on samples of nurses that were not totally firstly, comparable results were obtained (Chatzittofis, Karanikola, Michailidou, & Constantinidou, 2021;Warchoł-Biedermann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Even with overwhelming circumstances such as the current pandemic, health care personnel including nurses can sustain their psychological and mental health and maintain their overall well‐being when they are equipped with positive coping skills (Chew et al, 2020; Shahrour & Dardas, 2020). Although evidence during the coronavirus pandemic has identified coping skills as an important factor in frontline nurses' level of emotional distress (Lorente et al, 2021), stress and secondary trauma (Vagni et al, 2020), and stress and mental health (Warchoł‐Biedermann et al, 2021), to our knowledge this study is the first to confirm the mediating effects of coping skills on the coronaphobia–turnover intention relationship. While this study does not reveal which coping mechanisms exert the greatest influence on the coronaphobia–turnover intention relationship, studies during the earlier surge of the virus strongly associated the use of problem‐solving strategies and other problem‐centred coping skills with lower emotional exhaustion, stress, dysfunctional anxiety, and traumatic symptoms (Mi et al, 2020; Zhu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, other coping mechanisms previously identified as effective for combating stressors, such as outdoor activities and exercise, can be more challenging at this time. Hence, innovative and alternative approaches should be used to maintain the social connectedness of nurses with their families, friends, and peers (such as the use of social media and other technologies) and to equip them with positive coping skills (Labrague, 2021; Warchoł‐Biedermann et al, 2021). Hospital administration should reinforce coping abilities in nurses through coping skills training, resilience‐promoting approaches, and other empirically‐based skill‐building interventions that can be delivered in person or online (Weiner et al, 2020; Zhang, Jiang, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All study designs were cross-sectional. Four studies used exploratory qualitative methods [ [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] ], four used quantitative descriptive techniques [ 14 , [30] , [31] , [32] ], 16 used correlational/analysis techniques [ 13 , 15 , 19 , 21 , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] ], and one used mixed methods [ 45 ]. In terms of study population, EMS personnel were studied independently in 14 articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%