2006
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysbiosis and pouchitis

Abstract: The evidence that dysbiosis is a cause of pouchitis is poor. Nevertheless, available data allow the construction of an algorithm to aid management and suggest a structured approach for future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 Since antibiotics are effective in treating acute episodes, and relapses seem at least in part to be prevented by oral probiotics, some have hypothesized that pouch microbiota has a role in the pathogenesis of pouchitis. 7,8 While multiple investigations have failed to identify a specific causative agent, 9 according to some studies sulphate-reducing bacteria, such as Clostridiaceae spp, Enterobacteriaceae spp and Bacteroidiaceae spp, might be implicated in the pathogenesis of pouchitis. [10][11][12][13][14][15] In our recent studies, we have observed that Clostridiaceae spp adherent to pouch mucosa are associated to chronic/ relapsing pouchitis while Enterococcaceae spp., and possibly Enterobacteriaceae spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,6 Since antibiotics are effective in treating acute episodes, and relapses seem at least in part to be prevented by oral probiotics, some have hypothesized that pouch microbiota has a role in the pathogenesis of pouchitis. 7,8 While multiple investigations have failed to identify a specific causative agent, 9 according to some studies sulphate-reducing bacteria, such as Clostridiaceae spp, Enterobacteriaceae spp and Bacteroidiaceae spp, might be implicated in the pathogenesis of pouchitis. [10][11][12][13][14][15] In our recent studies, we have observed that Clostridiaceae spp adherent to pouch mucosa are associated to chronic/ relapsing pouchitis while Enterococcaceae spp., and possibly Enterobacteriaceae spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…No single identifiable causative organism has been detected as the cause of pouchitis, but the infiltration of neutrophils and the proven response to antibacterial therapy suggest that pouchitis could have a bacterial cause [24][25][26][27] . However, different facts suggest that HCMV is a real gastrointestinal pathogen and that it can be partly related to the development of pouchitis in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with molecular microbiology techniques, no individual species or phylotype specifically associated with either UC or FAP pouchitis were found [44,47], and the role of bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in pouchitis is controversial [44,47,50]. It has been difficult to identify bacterial profiles unique for pouchitis with cross-sectional study design.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%