2005
DOI: 10.1080/03091920500334159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamo action in flows with cat's eyes

Abstract: Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 99, pp. 413-429, http://dx.doi.org./10.1080/03091920500334159International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This differs from the situation for flows where the cells have a cats-eye topology, where there appear to be distinct sets of branches that do not interact. 13 The flows we are considering have less symmetry than both these flows and the Roberts flow, and one would therefore not expect to find a sharp distinction between flows of largeand small-scale type since there are no symmetries to distinguish. Nonetheless, the smoothness of the transition was more marked than we were expecting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This differs from the situation for flows where the cells have a cats-eye topology, where there appear to be distinct sets of branches that do not interact. 13 The flows we are considering have less symmetry than both these flows and the Roberts flow, and one would therefore not expect to find a sharp distinction between flows of largeand small-scale type since there are no symmetries to distinguish. Nonetheless, the smoothness of the transition was more marked than we were expecting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…the flow properties are continuously changed from those of the circularly polarized to those of the cat's-eye flow. The structure of these flows has been thoroughly analyzed by Galloway (2012) and Courvoisier et al (2005), respectively, see also references therein. The computations of Tanner and Hughes (2003) show the flow structure as δ is varied.…”
Section: Model Flow and Lagrangian Passive Vector Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a big concern of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) is in the saturation mechanisms and the dynamic regime in which the magnetic field and the flow properties are tightly coupled, the kinematic approach is still used to understand how a flowfield promotes the dynamo effect (Kaplan et al 2012, McWilliams 2012, Bouya and Dormy 2013, Hughes and Proctor 2013. In the kinematic model, the flowfield is given-most often analytically-and used to derive the magnetic field from the induction equation; see for instance Courvoisier et al (2005) and Galloway (2012) for a review of the most current model flows. Now, while the passive vector alignments have been investigated in turbulent flows (Ohkitani 2002, Tsinober andGalanti 2003), it appears that a few studies devoted to the dynamo effect specifically deal with the alignment properties of the magnetic field vector (Brandenburg 1995, Polygiannakis andMoussas 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple steady cellular flows that take the form u(x, y) and possess just one spatial scale have been utilized in studies of transport coefficients over many years; these date back to the pioneering work of Roberts (1970), with subsequent modifications by, for example, Plunian & Rädler (2002), Childress & Soward (1989) and Courvoisier, Gilbert & Ponty (2005). The natural extension to time-periodic flows of the form u(x, y, t) has been considered by, for example, Majda & Kramer (1999) for scalar diffusion and by Courvoisier, Hughes & Tobias (2006) and Rädler & Brandenburg (2009) for the α-effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%