1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(99)00021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics under the influence of semi-Markov noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several different ways to derive the corresponding equations are known in the literature (e.g., [13][14][15][16][17] ); the one especially fitted to describing response to time-dependent fields is given in [18]. For the sake of completeness, we give here the sketch of this derivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different ways to derive the corresponding equations are known in the literature (e.g., [13][14][15][16][17] ); the one especially fitted to describing response to time-dependent fields is given in [18]. For the sake of completeness, we give here the sketch of this derivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the ATA and FATA generate exact realizations of the stochastic process. Their connection to perturbative solutions of the underlying master equation may allow one to include in future work also non-Markovian features of a stochastic dynamics by letting the rejection probabilities to depend on the history [13]. Compared to the RTA and FRTA, the new algorithms should in particular be favorable, when considering periodically driven systems with interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inserting I = D −1 D after each matrixÃ, one arrives at (13) resembles the ATA: The transition probabilities G ij (t, t ′ ) are decomposed into paths with an arbitrary number n = 0, 1, 2, . .…”
Section: Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the channel is not memoryless, our approach also assumes additive Markov noise; other noise models are possible, for example semiMarkov noise (e.g. Chvosta and Reineker, 1999), or nonadditive noise. The approach is able to model intersymbol interference (ISI), as explained in Ferrari et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%