2009
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/46/464127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of wetting: from inertial spreading to viscous imbibition

Abstract: We report the influence of the nature of boundaries on the dynamics of wetting. We review some work recently published and highlight new experimental observations. Our paper begins with the spreading of drops on substrates and demonstrates how the exponents of the spreading laws are affected either by the surface chemistry or by the droplet shape. We then discuss the imbibition of completely and partially wetting fluids into channels and over microtextured surfaces. Starting with the one-dimensional imbibition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
128
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of our understanding of the reason droplets demonstrate dissimilar contact angles along different directions (line-of-sight), we developed a geometric model to predict the side-length ratio 31 B/A of the octagonal droplets in our experiments. Different depinning contact angles along the two directions, but with the same droplet height (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of our understanding of the reason droplets demonstrate dissimilar contact angles along different directions (line-of-sight), we developed a geometric model to predict the side-length ratio 31 B/A of the octagonal droplets in our experiments. Different depinning contact angles along the two directions, but with the same droplet height (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has proven very successful in the low-viscosity limit. The coalescence of water drops 13 shows the same dynamics as water drops spreading in total wetting conditions 12,[18][19][20] . In both cases it was found that r ∼ t 1/2 , with prefactors in agreement with potential flow calculations 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Wicking experiments with mat strips were performed to evaluate another aspect of the wetting behavior 31 of electrospun materials. The results are presented in Figure 3a for 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 13 capillaries with an equivalent radius of the capillary structure r. Neglecting the hydrostatic pressure, the relation between the height h and time t can be described as 33 :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%