2018
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of water entry

Abstract: Diving induces large pressure during water entry accompanied by the creation of cavity and water splash ejected from the free water surface. To minimize impact forces, divers streamline their shape at impact. Here, we investigate the impact forces and splash evolution of wedges entering water as a function of the wedge opening angle. A gradual transition from impactful to smooth entry is observed as the wedge angle decreases. After submersion, the wedge experiences significantly smaller drag forces (two-fold s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both length and depth also differ between foraging groups, but these patterns were not significant once phylogeny was taken into consideration. Our study aligns with hydrodynamic expectations based on water piercing studies using geometrically perfect cones [12,14]. Diving species have beaks of lower base width and tend toward longer beaks with lower base depth ( figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both length and depth also differ between foraging groups, but these patterns were not significant once phylogeny was taken into consideration. Our study aligns with hydrodynamic expectations based on water piercing studies using geometrically perfect cones [12,14]. Diving species have beaks of lower base width and tend toward longer beaks with lower base depth ( figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additional morphological details not measured in this study likely contribute to dive performance, including the morphology of the head, body and wings of the bird. In Vincent et al's [14] recent work, the larger the radius of the cone base (r, corresponding to depth and width on our kingfishers), the higher the initial impact forces, due to increased frontal and surface area [12], which increase both pressure and friction drag, respectively. This suggests that not only the shape of the beak, but the shape of the frontal area of the bird (which is generally wider than the beak) likely plays a role in plunge diving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The jet velocity versus the entry velocity for the case of α =90 o and α =120 o is plotted in Figure . Generally, our method overpredicts the jet velocity and underpredict the jet angle in comparison with reference data from the work of Vincent et al for α =90. When α =120, our computed jet quantities fit quite well with the experimental and theoretical results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The computational domain is illustrated in Figure A. The size of the rectangular domain is 0.51 m of width and 0.32 m of height, as reported in the work of Vincent et al The wedge width d =0.036 m is held constant for the whole simulation. The nonuniform grid of 260×180 is shown in Figure B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chuang [83,187,188] performed several insightful experimental studies with different geometries and deadrise angles of the impactor. Works by Tveitnes et al [189] and Vincent et al [190] focussed on the total impact force on the wedge. Takemoto's experimental results validated the Wagner profile (pressure distribution along the wetted surface of the wedge) [191].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%