2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b07303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the Protein Search for Targets on DNA in the Presence of Traps

Abstract: Protein search for specific binding sites on DNA is a fundamental biological phenomenon associated with the beginning of most major biological processes. It is frequently found that proteins find and recognize their specific targets quickly and efficiently despite the complex nature of protein-DNA interactions in living cells. Although significant experimental and theoretical efforts was made in recent years, the mechanisms of these processes remain not well clarified. We present a theoretical study of the pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us present several specific examples, although many more results have been obtained. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] We start with the problem of how the presence of multiple target sites or multiple semi-specific trap sites affect the dynamics of the protein search.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Targets and Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us present several specific examples, although many more results have been obtained. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] We start with the problem of how the presence of multiple target sites or multiple semi-specific trap sites affect the dynamics of the protein search.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Targets and Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the two-target case the mean search times are averaged over all trajectories to both sites, while for the target and the trap system the mean search times are obtained only by considering the trajectories finishing at the target. 19 The results of calculations for the dynamic properties of the protein search in the presence of traps are presented in Figures 4 and 6. Again, three dynamic search phases are observed, but adding the trap generally facilitates the search dynamics, which is a counter-intuitive result: see Figure 4.…”
Section: The Effect Of Multiple Targets and Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a ~ 150 bp, then the bending of a DNA segment of size X0 into a circular loop requires 2 elastic 0 2 E a X π ~ 20-30 kBT. The average energy associated with the site-specific binding of TFs with CRMs (DBD1-S1 interactions) seems to be around - (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) kBT (66) and the energy associated with the cumulative nonspecific interactions of all the DBD2s of TFs (~3n as in Eq. 12) will be around -(10-15) kBT.…”
Section: Feasibility Of the Propulsion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site specific binding of TFs with the genomic DNA seems to be influenced by several factors under in vivo conditions [9] viz. (a) conformational state of DNA [9,10] (b) spatial organization of various functionally related CRMs along the genomic DNA [11,12], (c) presence of other dynamic roadblock TF proteins and semi-stationary roadblocks such as nucleosomes especially in eukaryotes [13][14][15][16], (d) naturally occurring sequence traps on DNA [17,18], (e) conformational fluctuations in the DNA binding domains (DBDs) of TFs ( Fig. 1B) [19][20][21] and (f) the nonspecific electrostatic attractive forces and the counteracting shielding effects of other solvent ions and water molecules acting at the DNA-protein interface [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ζ is the distance between the position of nucleosome and location of TSS and TFBS on DNA. To include the effects of nucleosome occupancy pattern in the random walk simulations, we modified the value of the delay parameter ε of nucleosome at each simulation step in a position dependent manner such that the exact location of TSS and TFBS.The simulation results corresponding to the weighting function ( ) ερ ζ for k = 1 are shown in Figs.6A-B.With these settings, our simulation results suggest that the ε term in the expression for the MFPT that is given in Eqs 18. transform as ρε where ρ is the overall average of the nucleosome occupancy values around TSS and TFBS as defined in Eqs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%