2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the Fouling Layer Microbial Community in a Membrane Bioreactor

Abstract: Membrane fouling presents the greatest challenge to the application of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. Formation of biofilms on the membrane surface is the suggested cause, yet little is known of the composition or dynamics of the microbial community responsible. To gain an insight into this important question, we applied 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing with a curated taxonomy and fluorescent in situ hybridization to monitor the community of a pilot-scale MBR carrying out enhanced biological nitrogen a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the TMP and flux have strong correlations with the fouling mechanism. From Figure 6, at the initial stage of the filtration process, as the flux increases at a steady d(TMP)/dt rate, the fouling rate (blue curve) is almost constant [206]. However, the maximum permeability was attained at a critical flux of 12 LMH, in which further increase yielded a steep declination of permeability and a sharp increase in membrane fouling (red line).…”
Section: Mbr Major Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the TMP and flux have strong correlations with the fouling mechanism. From Figure 6, at the initial stage of the filtration process, as the flux increases at a steady d(TMP)/dt rate, the fouling rate (blue curve) is almost constant [206]. However, the maximum permeability was attained at a critical flux of 12 LMH, in which further increase yielded a steep declination of permeability and a sharp increase in membrane fouling (red line).…”
Section: Mbr Major Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the membrane is more susceptible to fouling under an anaerobic condition at high MLSS concentration. This is because as the activated sludge aged (SRT), the viscosity increases and the foulants such as particulates, EPS and SMP easily get polarized on the membrane to form cake layer [206,207]. However, some of the noticeable approach used to mitigate fouling in AnMBR system includes BAF [62] and intermittent frequent filtration-relaxation [201] which have presented some improvement in terms of steady filtration and pollutants removals, particularly the COD and TSS.…”
Section: Anaerobic Processes In Mbr (Anmbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent 16S rRNA-based molecular surveys have identified Ca. Nitrotoga-like sequences in a wide range of habitats, including: glacial soils [14][15][16][17], an underground cave [18], a freshwater seep [19], drinking water [20,21], a subglacial Antarctic lake [22], Yellow Sea seawater [23], salt marsh sediments [24], rivers [25,26], and various wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) or sequence batch reactors [13,[27][28][29][30][31][32]. The relative abundance of Ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofouling is also considered the “Achilles heel” of RO because even if 99.9% of the microorganisms are removed from the membrane, the remaining microorganisms can re-form a biofilm [ 9 ]. Moreover, treating biofilms is a complex problem because the components of biofilms vary depending on the type of microorganisms in the water and on the environmental and operational conditions [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%