1983
DOI: 10.1163/156853983x00228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Territorial Singing Between Neighboring Song Sparrows (Melospiza Melodia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is again independent of context, but focuses on receiver response. Alternatively, song switching may be an indicator of motivation to attack (Falls & D'Agincourt 1982;Kramer & Lemon 1983;Stoddard et al 1988), and this predicts that switching rates are affected by motivation and context rather than song rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is again independent of context, but focuses on receiver response. Alternatively, song switching may be an indicator of motivation to attack (Falls & D'Agincourt 1982;Kramer & Lemon 1983;Stoddard et al 1988), and this predicts that switching rates are affected by motivation and context rather than song rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such asymmetries in the timing of their songs are thought to re£ect di¡erences in social state and status (Hultsch & Todt 1982). Furthermore, studies in other species on timing of songs during vocal interactions have shown that di¡erence in the timing of songs is functionally important (Todt 1981;Kramer & Lemon 1983;Popp 1989;Brindley 1991;Nielsen & Vehrencamp 1995;Dabelsteen et al 1996Dabelsteen et al , 1997. Song overlapping, for instance, in many cases is used and perceived as an agonistic signal (Todt & Naguib 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that orange-fronted conure flocks responded with higher contact call rates during trials that ended in partial fusions (Fig 2). Such an increase in response rate could be explained by increased arousal during decision disagreements in flocks [87] or more individuals trying to influence the decision outcome [80]. In contrasts, flocks matched the stimulus calls better in trials where all individuals made the same decision (Fig 4).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 96%