2015
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2015.1031780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of teat-end vacuum during machine milking: types, causes and impacts on teat condition and udder health – a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, Mein et al (2004) reported that regular vacuum fluctuations could not be responsible for worse udder health values if there were not also pulsation failures, liner slips, or intense machine stripping. More- Besier et al (2016) stated that even irregular or cyclic vacuum fluctuations per se seem not to have any negative affect; rather, the combination of several parameters, such as the simultaneous existence of irregular and regular vacuum fluctuations at high vacuum levels and long machine-on times or overmilking, are responsible for the occurrence of udder infection, edema, or hyperkeratosis. According to Mein et al (2004), the effect of machine milking could only be responsible for 6 to 20% of the prevalence of mastitis in a dairy farm.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, Mein et al (2004) reported that regular vacuum fluctuations could not be responsible for worse udder health values if there were not also pulsation failures, liner slips, or intense machine stripping. More- Besier et al (2016) stated that even irregular or cyclic vacuum fluctuations per se seem not to have any negative affect; rather, the combination of several parameters, such as the simultaneous existence of irregular and regular vacuum fluctuations at high vacuum levels and long machine-on times or overmilking, are responsible for the occurrence of udder infection, edema, or hyperkeratosis. According to Mein et al (2004), the effect of machine milking could only be responsible for 6 to 20% of the prevalence of mastitis in a dairy farm.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of vacuum fluctuations has been discussed in many research works, as reported by Besier et al (2016). Certain means of transmission of pathogen agents between animals, such as reverse flow, impacts, or reverse pressure gradients, are related to the changes in vacuum level in the short milk tubes during milking (Rasmussen et al, 1994;Billon et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsating motion and significant fluctuations in pressure occur, which reduces the efficiency of the transporting link [6,13]. In addition, fluctuation of pressure negatively affects the health of cows [5,9].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was established [7,8] that systematic fluctuations in pressure cause the loss of cow productivity by 9.2 %. Insufficient level of vacuum pressure leads to a decrease in milk production by 14 %; there is the effect of «ballooning» nipple rubber, which causes coming down of the milking cups [8][9][10]. At a high vacuum, there is the increased danger for cows of the disease of mastitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Mein & Reinemann ; Besier & Bruckmaier ; Besier et al . ) may be carried out through observations; through dry testing, in which the milking machine is activated and the machine is checked without actually performing milking; and through dynamic testing carried out during milking. Observations means that the machine is examined by eye to look for any abnormalities, so the results depend upon the skill of the person carrying out the examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%