2007
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200625071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of 13C‐labeled mustard litter (Sinapis alba) in particle‐size and aggregate fractions in an agricultural cropland with high‐ and low‐yield areas

Abstract: The application of 13 C-labeled litter enables to study decomposition processes as well as the allocation of litter-derived carbon to different soil C pools. 13 Carbon-labeled mustard litter was used in order to compare decomposition processes in an agricultural cropland with high-yield (HY) and low-yield (LY) areas, the latter being characterized by a finer texture and a lower organic-C (OC) content. After tracer application, 13 C concentrations were monitored in topsoil samples in particulate organic matter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOC balance of these soils is maintained by root and shoot litter inputs which enter the soil as particulate organic matter (POM). Characterised by high turnover rates and great lability, POM functions as an indicator for high C input and SOC turnover rates in different land use systems (Buyanovsky et al 1994;Kölbl et al 2006Kölbl et al , 2007Noellemeyer et al 2006), especially in systems characterised by a perennial grass sward (Dubeux et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOC balance of these soils is maintained by root and shoot litter inputs which enter the soil as particulate organic matter (POM). Characterised by high turnover rates and great lability, POM functions as an indicator for high C input and SOC turnover rates in different land use systems (Buyanovsky et al 1994;Kölbl et al 2006Kölbl et al , 2007Noellemeyer et al 2006), especially in systems characterised by a perennial grass sward (Dubeux et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the is even greater than the initial 14 C distribution in this soil fraction. Therefore, it can be assumed that kinetic processes not only cause a decrease in the C content but also a redistribution of C from larger to smaller soil particle‐size fractions, which has already been observed by Buyanovsky et al (1994), Aita et al (1997), Anger & Recous (1997), Stemmer et al (1999), Gale & Cambardella (2000), Kölbl et al (2007) and others. Additionally, Figure 2 indicates that 70–80% of the residual 14 C is located in the 0–53‐µm soil particle fraction at the end of the incubation, compared with only 30% at the beginning of the experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, a concomitant integration of small FOM in soil aggregates increases its physical protection against decomposition (Sollins et al , 1996; Christensen, 2001; Six et al , 2002). Results on the effects of soil particle‐size fractions on the distribution and decomposition kinetics support these mechanisms under field and laboratory conditions (Buyanovsky et al , 1994; Balesdent, 1996; Aita et al , 1997; Stemmer et al , 1999; Gale & Cambardella, 2000; John et al , 2005; Kölbl et al , 2007). The decomposition results are generally fitted by single first‐order kinetics or a combination of parallel first‐order kinetics (Jenkinson, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Reported negative values for any of the considered quantities were removed, but if primary data showed major inconsistencies (e.g., negative fractions of remaining residues) that could not be explained even after contacting the authors, the whole study was excluded. After this screening, the database contained data from 39 published articles (Magid et al, 2002;Kölbl et al, 2006Kölbl et al, , 2007Cotrufo et al, 2015Cotrufo et al, , 2022Throckmorton et al, 2015;Haddix et al, 2016Haddix et al, , 2020Lian et al, 2016;Pries et al, 2017Pries et al, , 2018Wang et al, 2017;Lavallee et al, 2018;Mitchell et al, 2018;Fang et al, 2019;Fulton-Smith and Cotrufo, 2019;Sokol et al, 2019;Liebmann et al, 2020;Su et al, 2020;Almeida et al, 2021;Ferreira et al, Xu et al, 2022;Canisares et al, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Duan et al, 2023;Kou et al, 2023b;Lyu et al, 2023;Neupane et al, 2023;Poeplau et al, 2023;Schiedung et al, 2023;Even and Cotrufo, 2024). Some datasets were directly accessible from online repositories (Buckeridge, 2021;Craig et al, 2021;Huys et al, 2022b;Kou et al, 2023a;Ridgeway et al, 2023a).…”
Section: Data Retrieval and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%