1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(97)83366-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
5

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
75
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By substituting Equation () into Equation (), the following is derived: boldufalse(tfalse)=i=1N[boldρitrueq˙i(t)+boldφiqi(t)] ${\bf{u}}(t)=\sum _{i=1}^{N}[{{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}{\dot{q}}_{i}(t)+{{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}{q}_{i}(t)]$where ρi=2Refalse(ηiϕifalse) ${{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}=2\text{Re}({\eta }_{i}{{\boldsymbol{\phi }}}_{i})$ and φi=2Refalse(λtrue¯iηiϕifalse) ${{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}=-2\text{Re}({\bar{\lambda }}_{i}{\eta }_{i}{{\boldsymbol{\phi }}}_{i})$. The modal responses, qifalse(tfalse) ${q}_{i}(t)$ and q˙ifalse(tfalse) ${\dot{q}}_{i}(t)$, can be solved by typical numerical approaches, 33,34 such as the Newmark‐β method. Compared with Equation (), the coefficient vector (ρi ${{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}$, φi ${{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}$) and unknown quantity (qifalse(tfalse) ${q}_{i}(t)$) in the foregoing equation are all in the form of real numbers, which are convenient to use in actual calculations.…”
Section: Complex Mode Analysis Methods For Damped Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By substituting Equation () into Equation (), the following is derived: boldufalse(tfalse)=i=1N[boldρitrueq˙i(t)+boldφiqi(t)] ${\bf{u}}(t)=\sum _{i=1}^{N}[{{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}{\dot{q}}_{i}(t)+{{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}{q}_{i}(t)]$where ρi=2Refalse(ηiϕifalse) ${{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}=2\text{Re}({\eta }_{i}{{\boldsymbol{\phi }}}_{i})$ and φi=2Refalse(λtrue¯iηiϕifalse) ${{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}=-2\text{Re}({\bar{\lambda }}_{i}{\eta }_{i}{{\boldsymbol{\phi }}}_{i})$. The modal responses, qifalse(tfalse) ${q}_{i}(t)$ and q˙ifalse(tfalse) ${\dot{q}}_{i}(t)$, can be solved by typical numerical approaches, 33,34 such as the Newmark‐β method. Compared with Equation (), the coefficient vector (ρi ${{\boldsymbol{\rho }}}_{i}$, φi ${{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}}_{i}$) and unknown quantity (qifalse(tfalse) ${q}_{i}(t)$) in the foregoing equation are all in the form of real numbers, which are convenient to use in actual calculations.…”
Section: Complex Mode Analysis Methods For Damped Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, can be solved by typical numerical approaches, 33,34 such as the Newmark-β method. Compared with Equation (29), the coefficient vector (ρ i , φ i ) and unknown quantity (q t ( ) i ) in the foregoing equation are all in the form of real numbers, which are convenient to use in actual calculations.…”
Section: Fundamental Equation Of Motion Of Ccqc Mode Superposition Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stresses needed to perform fatigue assessment can be predicted using finite element dynamic analysis in the time or frequency domains. Dynamic behaviour is defined by mass, damping and stiffness matrices (Beards, 1996;Chopra, 2019;Clough and Penzien, 1993) and simplified fatigue loading models from codes and standards (API, 2000;British Standards Institution, 2005;ISO 13819-2:1995ISO 13819-2: , 1995NORSOK Standar, 2004) are usually considered in fatigue analysis.…”
Section: Fatigue Monitoring Of Structures 133mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equation of the generalised SDOF system with damping ratio ζ can be expressed as 41 : trueübadbreak+2ζω1trueu̇goodbreak+ω12u0.28emgoodbreak=trueLüg()tm0.28em$$\begin{equation}\ddot u + 2\zeta {\omega _1}\dot u + \omega _1^2u\; = \frac{{ - \tilde L{{\ddot u}_g}\left( t \right)}}{{\tilde m}}\;\end{equation}$$where üg(t)${\ddot u_g}( t )$ is the base excitation, trueLüg(t)$ - \tilde L{\ddot u_g}( t )$ is the generalised excitation and ω 1 is the frequency: trueLbadbreak=0HmcH0.28em0.28emψ()hdhgoodbreak+mpψ0.28em()Hgoodbreak=120.28emmcgoodbreak+mp$$\begin{equation}\tilde L = \mathop \int \nolimits_0^H \frac{{{m_c}}}{H}\;\;\psi \left( h \right)dh + {m_p}\psi \;\left( H \right) = \frac{1}{2}\;{m_c} + {m_p}\end{equation}$$ ω1badbreak=km0.50.28emgoodbreak=12EI1335mc+mpH30.28em$$\begin{equation}{\omega _1} = {\left( {\frac{{\tilde k}}{{\tilde m}}} \right)^{0.5}}\; = \sqrt {\frac{{12EI}}{{\left( {\frac{{13}}{{35}}{m_c} + {m_p}} \right){H^3}}}} \;\end{equation}$$where m...…”
Section: Modelling Of Rocking Shear Frame With Tendon Restraintmentioning
confidence: 99%