2008
DOI: 10.3923/rjb.2008.49.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Savannas in Swaziland: Encroachment of Woody Plants in Relation to Land Use and Soil Classes and Indigenous Knowledge on Plants Utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, protected area managers should be able to aggressively thin shrubs to increase the abundance of large-bodied terrestrial mammals without losing bird species (Soto-Shoender et al, 2018), while community leaders on homestead lands (where large-bodied wild mammals rarely occur) may want to encourage people to retain shrubby vegetation, which should attract more birds without displacing the shrub-avoiding species that presently occupy homestead lands. Additional ancillary benefits to retaining shrubs on homestead lands might include: reduction of soil erosion; additional livestock forage; and natural pest control and pollination services provided by birds and beneficial insects that respond positively to shrub cover (Tefera, Dlamini, & Dlamini, 2008;Blaum et al, 2009;Morandin, Long & Kremen, 2016;Xiong, Sun, & Chen, 2018). Second, retaining suitable vegetation structure in community pastures and homestead lands should promote species' occurrence to a similar degree across bird diets, so managers probably do not need to promote specific plant species to see increased bird occurrence.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, protected area managers should be able to aggressively thin shrubs to increase the abundance of large-bodied terrestrial mammals without losing bird species (Soto-Shoender et al, 2018), while community leaders on homestead lands (where large-bodied wild mammals rarely occur) may want to encourage people to retain shrubby vegetation, which should attract more birds without displacing the shrub-avoiding species that presently occupy homestead lands. Additional ancillary benefits to retaining shrubs on homestead lands might include: reduction of soil erosion; additional livestock forage; and natural pest control and pollination services provided by birds and beneficial insects that respond positively to shrub cover (Tefera, Dlamini, & Dlamini, 2008;Blaum et al, 2009;Morandin, Long & Kremen, 2016;Xiong, Sun, & Chen, 2018). Second, retaining suitable vegetation structure in community pastures and homestead lands should promote species' occurrence to a similar degree across bird diets, so managers probably do not need to promote specific plant species to see increased bird occurrence.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variations in the composition of dominant woody plants could also be explained by landscape patches and heterogeneity both within each site and between sites, which is a function of rainfall variability (Sankaran et al 2005) and soil fertility (Boone 2005, Tefera et al 2008. Pastoralists' descriptions of dominant woody vegetation may suggest that the landscape consists of patches of land highly encroached or not encroached, as suggested by patch dynamics (Meyer et al 2009).…”
Section: Woody Vegetation Composition As Perceived By Pastoralistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fire, rainfall and herbivores on the encroachment of woody species (Stevens et al, 2016). Despite such efforts mechanisms regulating savanna tree populations are still not well understood (Holdo et al, 2009;Tefera et al, 2008).…”
Section: Woody Plant Encroachment In Savannasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along each transect, encroaching trees were identified and counted in plots and bare ground cover was visually estimated (Monteiro et al, 2018). Multi-stemmed woody plants were considered as separate individuals if they were >40 cm apart (Tefera et al, 2008). Data obtained were used in analysis of abundance, structure and composition of woody plant species.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%