Recognition that the transformation of one form into another is caused by both internal and external factors is the foundation and driving philosophy underlying all research in the field of biology. 10,11 In practice, however, studies of the internal (proximate) causes of biological transformation within the lifetime of an organism and of the external (ultimate) causes of transformation from one generation to the next (evolutionary transformation) have been pursued independently in two sub-disciplines, developmental and evolutionary biology, respectively. This situation has changed with the emergence of evolutionary developmental biology or "evo-devo," which seeks, by means of a comparative approach, to explain the evolution and development of morphological characters as well as the evolution of their underlying genetic and developmental mechanisms. 12 Essential to this approach is a well-defined and strongly supported phylogeny from which homology and the direction of morphological transformations can be accurately assessed. [13][14][15] Exciting and significant findings have been made in evo-devo. One is that the metazoan body plan is established by a surprisingly small set of highly conserved patterning genes. These homeobox (Hox) genes (Fig. 2), which originated early in metazoan evolution, are distributed throughout the animal kingdom. 16 -18 Another important finding is that homology at the genetic level is not necessarily correlated with homology at the morphological level. For example, the compound eyes of insects and the camera eyes of vertebrates evolved independently, but in both the initiation of eye formation requires expression of the same gene, Pax-6. 19 It also has been demonstrated that morphological novelties such as butterfly eye spots 20 or limbless tetrapods (snakes 21 ) result from alterations in the molecular mechanisms that control the development of major anatomical structures. Moreover, the evolution of developmental systems, which mediate morphological evolution, can occur by slight changes in the regulation of otherwise conserved patterning genes (Fig. 3). [22][23][24] While evo-devo research has focused primarily on broad taxonomic comparisons and major morphological transitions such as that from fish fins to tetrapod limbs, its potential for explaining phenotypic differences between and among closely related taxa is clearly recognized. [25][26][27] In this context, understanding how molecular evolution shapes genetic variation of patterning and growth genes in different primate lineages can be a powerful method for linking genetic and developmental variation to phenotypic (morphological) variation at both the microevolutionary and macroevolutionary scales. 28 -31 Indeed, the focus of evo- The order Primates is composed of many closely related lineages, each having a relatively well established phylogeny supported by both the fossil record and molecular data. 1 Primate evolution is characterized by a series of adaptive radiations beginning early in the Cenozoic era. Studies of th...