Abstract:Personality researchers are increasingly interested in the dynamics of personality, that is, the proximal causal mechanisms underlying personality and behavior. Here, we review the Zurich Model of Social Motivation concerning its potential to explain central aspects of personality. It is a cybernetic model that provides a nomothetic structure of the causal relationships among needs for security, arousal, and power, and uses them to explain an individual's approach‐avoidance or “proximity‐distance” behavior. We… Show more
“…Within interventions, discrepancy awareness, resource activation, awareness of beliefs/motives, and practicing new behaviours are relevant factors for personality growth 1 1 We refer to ‘personality growth’ as adaptive changes in personality traits. ‘These adaptations might encompass the integration of negative experiences as well as improvements in needs and goal attainment, which are typically considered as a basis for enhancements in happiness’ ( Quirin et al, 2023 ). ( Stieger et al, 2021 ).…”
Interventions can foster personal growth. However, our understanding of the specific mechanisms for change and the types of interventions driving this growth process remains limited. In this study, we focused on emotion regulation ability as a potential mechanism. We examined the effects of an affirmation coaching intervention on changes in emotion regulation ability, an important facet of personality. In this coaching intervention, participants created a personal mantra/goal derived from a selected image and positive associations linked to this image (motto goals). This is considered to enhance emotion regulation abilities by internalizing self-stabilizing value. We assigned sixty-six participants to either this affirmation coaching intervention or one of two control coaching interventions: specific-goal versus indulgence coaching. Before and after each intervention, participants completed questionnaires. Only the affirmation coaching intervention significantly increased in adaptive aspects of personality. Notably, the affirmation coaching intervention increased emotion regulation ability, and this effect persisted even when controlling for extraversion and neuroticism. Furthermore, exploratory analysis showed that extraversion increased following the affirmation coaching, while neuroticism remained unchanged. Our results suggest that emotion regulation ability might be the key factor in personality growth. It could be more malleable and/or respond more strongly to short-term coaching, compared to neuroticism. Thus, the malleability of personality traits may not be an all-or-nothing phenomenon; rather, it could depend on the facet of emotion regulation ability. We discuss potential mechanisms of personality growth, distinguishing between emotion regulation and emotion sensitivity.
“…Within interventions, discrepancy awareness, resource activation, awareness of beliefs/motives, and practicing new behaviours are relevant factors for personality growth 1 1 We refer to ‘personality growth’ as adaptive changes in personality traits. ‘These adaptations might encompass the integration of negative experiences as well as improvements in needs and goal attainment, which are typically considered as a basis for enhancements in happiness’ ( Quirin et al, 2023 ). ( Stieger et al, 2021 ).…”
Interventions can foster personal growth. However, our understanding of the specific mechanisms for change and the types of interventions driving this growth process remains limited. In this study, we focused on emotion regulation ability as a potential mechanism. We examined the effects of an affirmation coaching intervention on changes in emotion regulation ability, an important facet of personality. In this coaching intervention, participants created a personal mantra/goal derived from a selected image and positive associations linked to this image (motto goals). This is considered to enhance emotion regulation abilities by internalizing self-stabilizing value. We assigned sixty-six participants to either this affirmation coaching intervention or one of two control coaching interventions: specific-goal versus indulgence coaching. Before and after each intervention, participants completed questionnaires. Only the affirmation coaching intervention significantly increased in adaptive aspects of personality. Notably, the affirmation coaching intervention increased emotion regulation ability, and this effect persisted even when controlling for extraversion and neuroticism. Furthermore, exploratory analysis showed that extraversion increased following the affirmation coaching, while neuroticism remained unchanged. Our results suggest that emotion regulation ability might be the key factor in personality growth. It could be more malleable and/or respond more strongly to short-term coaching, compared to neuroticism. Thus, the malleability of personality traits may not be an all-or-nothing phenomenon; rather, it could depend on the facet of emotion regulation ability. We discuss potential mechanisms of personality growth, distinguishing between emotion regulation and emotion sensitivity.
“…Another theme of this special issue, based on the motivational dimension of personality, is whether set points or settling point models are more valid in explaining personality dynamics. Two theoretical articles by Read and Miller (2023) and Quirin et al (2023) broadly engage with this issue by comprehensively exploring the evidence for set points or settling point models, respectively.…”
Section: And the Motivational Dimension Of Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show how behavioral regulation can operate through a process of interactive forces and predictive models without the use of goal-corrected mechanisms. Quirin et al (2023) propose a setpoint model of social motivation in the context of personality research. They note that personality researchers are increasingly interested in the dynamics of personality (Jayawickreme et al, 2021;Quirin et al, 2020).…”
Section: And the Motivational Dimension Of Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quirin et al (2023) propose a setpoint model of social motivation in the context of personality research. They note that personality researchers are increasingly interested in the dynamics of personality (Jayawickreme et al, 2021; Quirin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Personality Dynamics and The Motivational Dimension Of Regul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This special issue of the Journal of Personality was designed to advance the field of personality dynamics in this respect. Eleven articles have been brought together: eight theoretical (Dunlop et al, 2023; Fajkowska, 2023; Nowak et al, 2023; Quirin et al, 2023; Read & Miller, 2023; Rogers et al, 2023; Skimina et al, 2023; Wilt & Revelle, 2023) and three empirical (Di Sarno et al, 2023; Hudson, 2023; Kersten et al, 2023). We here outline four topics and elaborate on how these articles contribute to them: Personality dynamics and levels of regulationPersonality dynamics and the motivational dimension of regulationDynamics and regulatory potentials of structural personality componentsPersonality dynamics and timescales…”
Personality dynamics have recently revived interest as a subject of systematic investigation in personality science. Personality dynamics theories and research refer to nonstatic phenomena related to personality, such as the regulatory mechanisms and processes involved in the control of behavior and experience related to personality and their interactions with situations. Such research is not only important to understand personality but also important to explain the large amount of variability in behavior and experience in an individual that can hardly be explained by a few personality traits. This introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Personality outlines the contributions of 11 articles tackling four emerging trends in the field: (1) personality dynamics and levels of regulation; (2) personality dynamics and the motivational dimension of regulation; (3) dynamics and regulatory potentials of structural personality components; and (4) personality dynamics and timescales. Moreover, we add recommendations for future exploration. Together, we believe that our special issue advances personality science in conceptualizing and examining personality dynamics as well as drawing attention to unanswered issues.
IntroductionResearch on the link between affect and creativity rests on the assumption that creativity unfolds as a stimulus‐driven response to affective states. We challenge this assumption and examine whether personality dynamics moderate the relationships between positive and negative mood with creativity.Theoretical ModelAccording to our model, personality dynamics that generate and maintain positive affect and downregulate negative affect energize creativity. Based on this model, we expect high creativity in response to negative mood if people engage in self‐motivation and achieve a reduction in negative mood. We further derive that individual differences in action versus state orientation moderate the within‐person relationship between mood and creativity.MethodWe conducted an experience‐sampling study and examined the relationship between mood and creativity in everyday work‐life. Two hundred and ten participants indicated their action‐state orientation and reported their mood three times a day over five consecutive workdays. At noon of each day, we assessed self‐motivation and in the evening the extent to which participants had generated novel and useful ideas during the day.ResultsWe observed high creativity when negative mood declined and self‐motivation was high. Action‐state orientation moderated the within‐person relationships of positive and negative mood with creativity.ConclusionPersonality dynamics determine whether positive and negative mood result in creativity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.