2016
DOI: 10.1109/taffc.2015.2478468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Non-Verbal Vocalizations and Hormones during Father-Infant Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we can predict both the assessment of a physiology expert from behavioural features and the assessment of external observers from physiological features shows that there is some coherence between behavioural and physiological cues when one is experiencing stress despite the lack of agreement between EOA and PEA annotations (Tables 6 and 7). This interplay between physiology and behaviour that we observe in our results is coherent with several works on facial expressions [64], [65], [66], emotions [67], and stress [36], [68]. However, for all 3 assessment sets considered, the combination of behavioural and physiological features provided the best results.…”
Section: Results Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that we can predict both the assessment of a physiology expert from behavioural features and the assessment of external observers from physiological features shows that there is some coherence between behavioural and physiological cues when one is experiencing stress despite the lack of agreement between EOA and PEA annotations (Tables 6 and 7). This interplay between physiology and behaviour that we observe in our results is coherent with several works on facial expressions [64], [65], [66], emotions [67], and stress [36], [68]. However, for all 3 assessment sets considered, the combination of behavioural and physiological features provided the best results.…”
Section: Results Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, the behavioural perspective investigates the impact of stress on human and animal behaviour both at individual and group levels [34], [35]. Both transfer of ethological research to human behaviour and social signal processing lead researchers to a promising approach of behavioral measure of stress in non human primates [34] and more recently in human subjects [35], [36]. Engaging in displacement behaviors such as scratching, face touching and lip biting have been associated with stressfull experiences and may give more valuable information about the subjects emotional state than verbal statements and verbal expressions [34].…”
Section: Stress Definition and Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, during dyadic interaction, caregivers are sensitive to infant vocalization, and their own vocal production regulates that of the infant [ 20 , 21 ]. Parents may also use infant-directed speech (IDS) that conveys linguistic as well as emotional components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have used the SFP to address the effects of separation on infants' physiology and behaviour, to test the consequences of early deprivation, and to measure infant attachment [ 23 , 28 , 29 ]. Similarly, the SFP has been used to tap infant stress physiology and has shown to increase infants cortisol levels [ 21 ]. However, this increase of cortisol is not systematic, and SF's stressful effects may be attenuated by using affectionate touch [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This synchrony phenomena remains true accross modalities and behaviors whether focusing on speech turns (e.g. Weisman et al, 2015;Jaffe et al, 2001), motion (Leclère et al, 2016), head movements (e.g. Hammal et al, 2015) and smile (Messinger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Synchrony and The Role Of Oxt During Early Interactionmentioning
confidence: 96%