2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9012-8_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Non-reacting and Reacting Flows Past Bluff Bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical data have been calculated by implementing the normal shock equations: Table 4 shows the comparison between the experimental and simulated results of the coefficient of aerodynamic drag from the literature and the current study. The experimental results from [23][24][25][26] involved tests on a 2% scale rigid parachute configuration over the MSL deployment range and a 4% scale flexible DGB parachute system within the Mach number range of 2.0-2.5. In these experiments, it was observed that the aerodynamic drag coefficient (C D ) for the flexible DGB parachute was approximately 0.48.…”
Section: Numerical Validation With Reference Work and Theoretical Res...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical data have been calculated by implementing the normal shock equations: Table 4 shows the comparison between the experimental and simulated results of the coefficient of aerodynamic drag from the literature and the current study. The experimental results from [23][24][25][26] involved tests on a 2% scale rigid parachute configuration over the MSL deployment range and a 4% scale flexible DGB parachute system within the Mach number range of 2.0-2.5. In these experiments, it was observed that the aerodynamic drag coefficient (C D ) for the flexible DGB parachute was approximately 0.48.…”
Section: Numerical Validation With Reference Work and Theoretical Res...mentioning
confidence: 99%