2013
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of nitrogen retention in entire male pigs immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone1

Abstract: Immunization against GnRH reduces the occurrence of boar-taint-causing compounds in entire male pigs and is likely to alter growth performance, including whole-body protein deposition (PD; N retention × 6.25). Thirty-six male pigs were used to determine the effects of immunization against GnRH with GnRH analog on N retention and plasma urea nitrogen (PUN; a measure of AA catabolism). Four treatments were used: 1) conventional, early castrates (EC), 2) entire male pigs (EM), 3) entire male pigs immunized with G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mullan, unpublished data). Similar serial N-balance observations (Huber et al, 2012) and data from trials in respiration chambers (J. Noblet et al, unpublished data) also indicate that a sharp decrease in amino acid requirements of immunized boars (in addition to the usual decrease because of increased BW) occurs during the third week after the second immunization.…”
Section: Lysine Requirements Of Immunocastrated Pigssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mullan, unpublished data). Similar serial N-balance observations (Huber et al, 2012) and data from trials in respiration chambers (J. Noblet et al, unpublished data) also indicate that a sharp decrease in amino acid requirements of immunized boars (in addition to the usual decrease because of increased BW) occurs during the third week after the second immunization.…”
Section: Lysine Requirements Of Immunocastrated Pigssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The rate of lean tissue deposition of immunized males appears to be maintained Dunshea et al, 2008;Moore et al, 2009) or decreased slightly Rikard-Bell et al, 2009;Huber et al, 2012) compared with that of entire males until approximately 4 weeks after the second immunization. Similarly, the rate of protein deposition, as measured continuously in respiration chambers, was maintained in the 4 weeks after the second immunization (J. Noblet, E. Gonzalo, E. Labussiè re, S. Dubois and J. van Milgen, unpublished data).…”
Section: Lysine Requirements Of Immunocastrated Pigsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was the case regardless of BW at the second immunization against GnRF or feeding level. This result is supported by Bauer et al (2009), Huber et al (2013, and Moore et al (2016). The increase in PUN concentration is caused by the drop in anabolic hormones in IC male pigs, resulting in decreased nitrogen retention (Claus et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In a nitrogen retention experiment, Huber et al (2013) found that by approximately d 8 after the second immunization against GnRF, the PUN concentration tended to be less in entire males compared with IC males with the PUN concentrations of IC males approaching those of physical castrates between d 7 and 16 following the second immunization against GnRF. In agreement with the current experiment, Bauer et al (2009) also found that PUN concentrations began to increase within 10 d after the second immunization against GnRF whereas Claus et al (2007) found that the PUN concentration increased immediately after the second immunization against GnRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In agreement with the current experiment, Bauer et al (2009) also found that PUN concentrations began to increase within 10 d after the second immunization against GnRF whereas Claus et al (2007) found that the PUN concentration increased immediately after the second immunization against GnRF. Huber et al (2013) attributes the differences in changing PUN concentrations following the second immunization between studies to variation in feed intake and protein deposition patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%