2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of nitrate and chloride during storm events in agricultural catchments with different subsurface drainage intensity (Indiana, USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(93 reference statements)
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to different proportions of runoff components in drainage runoff, e.g., sites lying in higher positions on slopes (typically P53) have lower proportions of baseflow and higher numbers of REs. Similar (very variable) proportions of event water (12% to 50%) for similar amounts of precipitation (20 to 30 mm) are reported by other studies [21,[50][51][52]. This variability in REs is more probably caused by diverse hydrological conditions in the catchments preceding the rain, namely, soil moisture, the groundwater level in summer, and snow cover for winter events, than by the intensity of rainfall [51], although some other studies reported contrarily [21,53].…”
Section: Runoff Events and Their Proportion On Total Runoff N And P supporting
confidence: 78%
“…This can lead to different proportions of runoff components in drainage runoff, e.g., sites lying in higher positions on slopes (typically P53) have lower proportions of baseflow and higher numbers of REs. Similar (very variable) proportions of event water (12% to 50%) for similar amounts of precipitation (20 to 30 mm) are reported by other studies [21,[50][51][52]. This variability in REs is more probably caused by diverse hydrological conditions in the catchments preceding the rain, namely, soil moisture, the groundwater level in summer, and snow cover for winter events, than by the intensity of rainfall [51], although some other studies reported contrarily [21,53].…”
Section: Runoff Events and Their Proportion On Total Runoff N And P supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Approximately 80% of watershed B is systematically tile drained, but tile drainage contributions to streamflow will likely be less in headwater watersheds with lower drainage intensities. For example, Kennedy et al (2012) showed that event water contributions to watershed discharge were significantly greater in an intensively drained watershed (70% of the watershed was tile drained) compared to a watershed with lower drainage intensity (30% of the watershed was tile drained). Differences in climate can also potentially influence the amount of tile drainage and its contributions to streamflow.…”
Section: Tile and Watershed Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water quality monitoring at the outlet of watersheds with different drainage intensities (Kennedy et al, 2012) and monitoring in nested watersheds (Tomer et al, 2003) have been used to estimate the impact of tile drains on watershed N fluxes. Studies have also calculated tile drainage contributions to watershed N export based on N loads from select tile drains within a watershed (David et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue has long been disregarded by hydrologists dealing with the quantification of input/output water fluxes, and has now rightfully become a cornerstone of hydrochemical studies. Typical applications include both atmospheric compounds entering the catchment through precipitation [Shaw et al, 2008;Godsey et al, 2010] or anthropogenic compounds injected onto the catchment, for example, due to farming activities [e.g., Basu et al, 2010;Rouxel et al, 2011;Kennedy et al, 2012]. Chlorides are an example of solutes which can be considered either geogenic or anthropogenic, because the mass input to the terrestrial part of the hydrologic cycle, whose proper quantification is sometimes problematic [Neal et al, 1988;Tetzlaff et al, 2007;Dunn and Bacon, 2008], originates either from atmospheric deposition and/or from the application of inorganic fertilizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%